Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hera Arms Triarii Glock report / review

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daniph
    Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 108

    Hera Arms Triarii Glock report / review

    Hey guys,

    Hopefully people find this informative and entertaining.



    I was looking for a CA legal platform shorter than a 14.5" AR15, but more versatility than a pistol. It shares the benefits of a bullpup, in that it's balanced and ideal for CQB. Empty it weighs in at 6 lbs and OAL is 26." Hera Arms has had these Triarii for a while but for some reason I haven't found many reviews or content, at least in English anyway. It wasn't until the SigTac ArmBrace that this became more viable for me.



    It basically allows you to use a Glock 17 unmodified and wrap it within a frame, extending your options on your platform. It's still classified as a pistol but you more or less have a semi-auto SMG or pistol carbine, however you'd like to call it. I have a Lone Wolf Distributed 9" barrel on backorder, but still wanted to test it out with a 4.5" barrel.

    Configuration:
    Glock 17 OD
    - Trijicon night sights
    - Glockworkx fulcrum trigger kit
    - LaserMax Green Guide Rod
    - (Back-ordered) LWD 9" Glock barrel

    Hera Arms Triarii
    - Primary Arms Micro Dot
    - A.R.M.S. 71 LR flip up sights
    - Sig Tac Arm Brace



    So far I've taken it to the range a couple of times and fired about 250 rounds total. The enhanced trigger kit and added weight of the Triarii frame make this an amazingly soft shooting gun. A friend's words described it as he took aim, pulled the trigger, heard the sound, felt nothing... his expression as quite rewarding. Since the barrel sits in the frame, the muzzle flash is almost non-existent from the sides as well.



    The Triarii uses the Glock rail to lock itself in to the pistol, so I installed a LaserMax Green rod so it could be used with and without the Triarii. Lots of pros and some cons with that piece as well. Combined with the PA Micro dot pointed at a target you also get a range finder as well. When pointing at a target at the zeroed range both the laser and RD are on one another. If closer then the green is below the RD, further, then the green laser is above the RD. This so far has helped me to compensate my aim between 7, 15 (zero), and 25 yards. The green laser also shuts off when the slide is locked back so I know I'm out.

    Downsides I've discovered so far. Since the Triarii frame covers the muzzle all that gun powder collects in the the frame and around the glock front site.



    The only part that's not covered is the area where the charging handle sits on the glock slide to allow you to rack the slide. Even the green laser got covered up, but amazingly still visible even at 25 yards (inside). I feel this would prolly be more difficult to see outside though. I do believe the longer barrel will eliminate this issue though as the muzzle will only be ~2 in. inside the frame instead of ~ 6 in. and the blast will be much further away from the green laser.




    The fact that the frame sits 6" in front of the muzzle leads me to what you see above... it seems like some of the rounds actually hit the locking lug, which prevented me from unlocking my glock form the Triarii on my second trip. I did not run into that issue on my first visit which i fired 100 rounds that trip. To their credit, I managed to unlock it later when I realized what happened by chipping away at the lead and copper keeping it from turning.. Germans definitely built this well. My friend noted to me a couple of times when he thought the sights were off because it was hitting low... I think some of the rounds were glancing off the locking lug.

    In short, this configuration allows me to easily do accurate double taps, its cheap to shoot, I can shoot steel targets since it's pistol ammo, its compact, and its about the same price point as an AR pistol. It doesn't modify your existing Glock. It's different but uses a common platform for parts (Glock and I think Sig as well?). It's well balanced and I can still fire it 1 handed and with a 2 handed pistol grip since the balance is centered around the grip.
  • #2
    Niviticus
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 1227

    I wonder how this compares to the Roni Kit for the Glock. I would be interested but the Roni kit turns your Glock into an SBR if you get the kit with the buttstock. They make 2 kits but the one with the buttstock seems to be much better ergonomics wise.

    Comment

    • #3
      SLO1911Fan
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 1483

      (4) A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
      (A) A threaded barrel, capable of accepting a flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer.
      (B) A second handgrip.
      (C) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the
      barrel that allows the bearer to fire the weapon with out burning his or her hand, except a slide that encloses the barrel.

      (D) The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip.
      I'm a big old, bourbon-soaked cigar-huffing ***, as God in his infinite wisdom meant me to be. - Charlie Sheen.

      Comment

      • #4
        daniph
        Member
        • Mar 2013
        • 108

        Thanks for the information. Partially me posting is to check up on people's thoughts about that stuff.

        From the research I've done. Angled fore-grips are allowed.

        (Source: http://www.guns.com/review/2013/11/1...a-arms-tiarii/ -- specifically their ATF letter here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0qy...zUx/edit?hl=en )

        that letter says it's ok on an AR pistol. I assume it translates to this platform as well.

        Regarding a barrel shroud, isn't that similar to an AR and some of the AR pistol pics I've seen here? I thought of the design more as a compensator than a flash hider if anything.

        I guess in the end I could just write another letter verifying the facts to the ATF of this configuration.








        Originally posted by SLO1911Fan
        (4) A semiautomatic pistol that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
        (A) A threaded barrel, capable of accepting a flash suppressor, forward handgrip, or silencer.
        (B) A second handgrip.
        (C) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles, the
        barrel that allows the bearer to fire the weapon with out burning his or her hand, except a slide that encloses the barrel.

        (D) The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip.

        Comment

        • #5
          Varg Vikernes
          Veteran Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 2831

          Except I don't think the barrel is underneath the "barrel shroud" in AK and AR builds. But I'm not sure.

          I mean what is the point of that thing really? Isn't the best for CQB just a pistol without making it 6lbs?

          Comment

          • #6
            NiteQwill
            Calguns Addict
            • Dec 2007
            • 6368

            Originally posted by daniph
            Thanks for the information. Partially me posting is to check up on people's thoughts about that stuff.

            From the research I've done. Angled fore-grips are allowed.

            (Source: http://www.guns.com/review/2013/11/1...a-arms-tiarii/ -- specifically their ATF letter here: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0qy...zUx/edit?hl=en )

            that letter says it's ok on an AR pistol. I assume it translates to this platform as well.

            Regarding a barrel shroud, isn't that similar to an AR and some of the AR pistol pics I've seen here? I thought of the design more as a compensator than a flash hider if anything.

            I guess in the end I could just write another letter verifying the facts to the ATF of this configuration.
            You have to understand that BATFE has nothing to do with CA DOJ laws. They are separate issues. You can be clear from ATF determination but still run afoul with CA assault weapon laws. Which, AFAIK, this chassis does.

            Not only that... The magazine is detachable in that setup. Big no-no.

            The fate of the wounded rest in the hands of the ones who apply the first dressing.

            Comment

            • #7
              SLO1911Fan
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 1483

              An AR/AK pistol has a magazine lock which makes the other features moot because it no longer has a removable magazine. Yours has a removable magazine which makes those features no-nos. That kit is more comparable to the uzis that everyone was building a few years ago. To be CA legal they either couldn't have the foregrip at all, or they had to have a magazine lock.
              I'm a big old, bourbon-soaked cigar-huffing ***, as God in his infinite wisdom meant me to be. - Charlie Sheen.

              Comment

              • #8
                daniph
                Member
                • Mar 2013
                • 108

                Thanks guys for the explanations between ATF and CADOJ as well as the UZI reference and alternative solutions. It looks like I have some options to consider.

                I can either remove the angled fore-grip, or add a glock bullet button which there are threads on that.

                Regarding the other question about why is it better than just a plain pistol for CQB. I guess that's up to the individual. The added weight makes recoil a lot more manageable (try double taping out to 15 yards and see how your groupings fair). It's not front heavy; that reminds me of bull-pups in that respect. It's also relatively short in length.

                Attaching and detaching the Triarii is also pretty quick, can be done in about 5 seconds without too much practice.

                Originally posted by SLO1911Fan
                An AR/AK pistol has a magazine lock which makes the other features moot because it no longer has a removable magazine. Yours has a removable magazine which makes those features no-nos. That kit is more comparable to the uzis that everyone was building a few years ago. To be CA legal they either couldn't have the foregrip at all, or they had to have a magazine lock.

                Comment

                • #9
                  uhlan1
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 6217

                  Not for me but cool nonetheless if you're into that type of thing.
                  I'd be careful if I were you and address any issues, they can read.
                  "Hence it happened that all the armed prophets conquered, all the unarmed perished." - Niccolo Machiavelli

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    NiteQwill
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 6368

                    To add: stay away from adding any stock to this setup once you legally configure it.

                    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

                    The fate of the wounded rest in the hands of the ones who apply the first dressing.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      daniph
                      Member
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 108

                      I store my Glock and Triarii separately, as it was intended to be a quick and compact conversion. I already removed the fore-grip as that was the most obvious legal configuration from the thread to me.

                      Are you suggesting I just delete the thread to be legally safe?

                      I can... it kills the spirit of learning and sharing knowledge in my eyes but oh well.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        uhlan1
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 6217

                        We live in occupied lands. Just sayin'.
                        "Hence it happened that all the armed prophets conquered, all the unarmed perished." - Niccolo Machiavelli

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Niviticus
                          Senior Member
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 1227

                          Originally posted by daniph
                          I store my Glock and Triarii separately, as it was intended to be a quick and compact conversion. I already removed the fore-grip as that was the most obvious legal configuration from the thread to me.

                          Are you suggesting I just delete the thread to be legally safe?

                          I can... it kills the spirit of learning and sharing knowledge in my eyes but oh well.
                          We just want you to be on the safe side. None of us want to see a fellow Calgunner get busted.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            SLO1911Fan
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 1483

                            Originally posted by daniph
                            Thanks guys for the explanations between ATF and CADOJ as well as the UZI reference and alternative solutions. It looks like I have some options to consider.

                            I can either remove the angled fore-grip, or add a glock bullet button which there are threads on that.

                            Regarding the other question about why is it better than just a plain pistol for CQB. I guess that's up to the individual. The added weight makes recoil a lot more manageable (try double taping out to 15 yards and see how your groupings fair). It's not front heavy; that reminds me of bull-pups in that respect. It's also relatively short in length.

                            Attaching and detaching the Triarii is also pretty quick, can be done in about 5 seconds without too much practice.
                            The problem actually goes deeper than the angled grip. The entire thing is a barrel shroud, which is a prohibited feature. The ruling on the uzi was that ANY second grip, forward, vertical, horizontal, angled, etc. was a prohibited feature. So without a bullet button you can't use that thing at all.
                            I'm a big old, bourbon-soaked cigar-huffing ***, as God in his infinite wisdom meant me to be. - Charlie Sheen.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1