LH9 Rail or no rail?

[manywelps]

http://www.lionheartindustries.com/lh9/

or

http://www.lionheartindustries.com/mk2/

I don't plan on carrying it, but can't rule it out.

I also don't plan on using attachments, but can't rule it out.

I guess it's down to looks... the railed version looks a little siggy if you ask me.

[MrExel17]

When I saw this pistol for the first time both version, though of the Sig 226.

I would go with the rail.

[Ibefuz]

I would say rail. Always better have the option for a light than not have one.

I wish i would have saved a little more money when i bought my first handgun a 92fs and bought a 92a1 because i want to run a light on my gun but cant

[phase1]

The mkII is going to be my next handgun. I was split between the lh9c & lh9 mkII, the mkII seems to be the same size as a glock19 so I'll go with this one

[sarcalan]

how does this gun compare to a glock 17?

[_TomT_]

how does this gun compare to a glock 17?

I think it compares closer to a cross between a CZ75 and a Sig P226.

BTW OP, do you know an FFL that is doing an SSE on this pistol? Nice Takemikazuchi...

[floogy]

Looks more like a Daewoo.

I love the patriot brown color frames on those. Go with the rail, but be holsters might be even harder to come by with the rail on it.

[mabilis_matulis]

I vote rail..

[cc12floz]

Looks more like a Daewoo.

I love the patriot brown color frames on those. Go with the rail, but be holsters might be even harder to come by with the rail on it.

Just FYI...G-Code already has a line of holsters for the LH9 series...Assuming you like G-Code holsters that is.

http://www.lionheartindustries.com/holsters

[Mad-B-Man]

I bought one without the rail, but only becuase it was cheap(ish).

If I had to pay full price, I'd get rails for sake of utility. I do like the clean non rail look more though.

[Arkangel]

I vote rail.

Better to have it and not need it, then to need it and not have it.