Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRP operator?
Collapse
X
-
-
I personally think the half-rail TRP Operator looks like an abortion.
Other half-rail guns don't bother me as much.......I guess its because the full-rail looks so gorgeous and then they went & screwed it up.
In any case, I don't care for it at all.Comment
-
-
X-NEW, I love your Kimber Warrior!! If you could only have one which would you take, Warrior II or TRP?sigpicIf you loan someone twenty dollars and never see them again, it was probably worth it.
Originally posted by hoffmangNFA is a long ways off as well it should be. Going after the NFA soon is like asking the girl you just met in the bar if she's into anal sex...-GeneComment
-
I'm selling both and sticking with my Custom IIComment
-
-
There's a guy on 1911Forums (goes by something like "2011Tuner"--talks like he's a custom pistolsmith) that insists that the TRP Operator is built to the Pro's accuracy standard (1.5" @ 25 yds.). In his opinion, the Pro was overpriced, while the TRP Operator, with a new fire control group, was a better overall value.Originally posted by DrjonesUSAThere are many people -- myself included, (and I own two Operators and two TRPs) who believe that the Operator seems as if it receives more attention from Springfield - the Operators just seem even nicer than the standard TRP.
All I know is, my full-length TRP Operator is a freakin' tackdriver!
ETA: Found a quote of his from 1911Forum ("2011BDLR"):
All TRP’s are simi -customs major parts are numbered and hand fitted prior to coating. That is why the product codes are PC = Custom shop and the serial prefixes are NM= National Match(over size rail specs for hand fitting). The TRP Operators are done in batches of 50 at a time. I have been told by a reliable source at SA “The TRP Operator was priced wrong at its introduction and it was supposed to be closer in price to the Pro Mod than the TRP, it meets or exceeds the Pro Mod accuracy standards” I bet 013 is the last 3 of your serial # on the pistol, right?
Out.
2011BLDRLast edited by BamBam-31; 09-23-2008, 12:36 PM.sigpicComment
-
DAMN! I just bought a regular TRP.Comment
-
i;ve had the pleasure to own both verions of the full rail and 1/2 rail TRP operators. In my opinion they were fine 1911's but the one thing that bothered me about them was that taking them down was a pain. I am firm believer in using no tools to take down a 1911 for field stripping and cleaning. because of the bull barrel one needs small pin to take down the gun.
i got rid of the operators for my wilson combat CQB with rail. that one uses a standard GI barrel as well as a GI recoil plug so i can take down the gun by hand with no probs. to each their own... im sure you will be happy with the TRP operator it is a fine choice. but i would also look into the warrior alsoComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,868,418
Posts: 25,170,228
Members: 357,642
Active Members: 5,354
Welcome to our newest member, Lvnfreenez_62.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 12459 users online. 134 members and 12325 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.



for the TRP! If I could afford it that is.
Comment