I checked to see if the Ruger P345 was on the approved list, and lo and behold it wasn't. Oddly, the KP345 was. I contacted DOJ Firearms and asked why one was allowed and not the other, and they said that Ruger hadn't submitted one for testing. I told him that the only difference between the two was a stainless vs blued slide, so he said Ruger would have to pay $200 to have it added as it's a only cosmetic difference. Earlier today I called Ruger and spoke with someone who handles California compliance, and they said they'd get back to me. I'm hoping they pursue this because I much prefer a P345 (blued slide) over the KP345.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruger P345
Collapse
X
-
Ruger P345
Tags: None -
I checked to see if the Ruger P345 was on the approved list, and lo and behold it wasn't. Oddly, the KP345 was. I contacted DOJ Firearms and asked why one was allowed and not the other, and they said that Ruger hadn't submitted one for testing. I told him that the only difference between the two was a stainless vs blued slide, so he said Ruger would have to pay $200 to have it added as it's a only cosmetic difference. Earlier today I called Ruger and spoke with someone who handles California compliance, and they said they'd get back to me. I'm hoping they pursue this because I much prefer a P345 (blued slide) over the KP345.
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,860,218
Posts: 25,065,407
Members: 355,125
Active Members: 5,725
Welcome to our newest member, GJag.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5706 users online. 79 members and 5627 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment