I checked to see if the Ruger P345 was on the approved list, and lo and behold it wasn't. Oddly, the KP345 was. I contacted DOJ Firearms and asked why one was allowed and not the other, and they said that Ruger hadn't submitted one for testing. I told him that the only difference between the two was a stainless vs blued slide, so he said Ruger would have to pay $200 to have it added as it's a only cosmetic difference. Earlier today I called Ruger and spoke with someone who handles California compliance, and they said they'd get back to me. I'm hoping they pursue this because I much prefer a P345 (blued slide) over the KP345.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ruger P345
Collapse
X
-
Ruger P345
Tags: None -
I checked to see if the Ruger P345 was on the approved list, and lo and behold it wasn't. Oddly, the KP345 was. I contacted DOJ Firearms and asked why one was allowed and not the other, and they said that Ruger hadn't submitted one for testing. I told him that the only difference between the two was a stainless vs blued slide, so he said Ruger would have to pay $200 to have it added as it's a only cosmetic difference. Earlier today I called Ruger and spoke with someone who handles California compliance, and they said they'd get back to me. I'm hoping they pursue this because I much prefer a P345 (blued slide) over the KP345.
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,869,041
Posts: 25,154,829
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,723
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 23392 users online. 77 members and 23315 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment