i have been shooting the 92fs for about 8 years now and i get a nice one hole grouping and i mean 1 hole the size of a dime 10 shots..... i just picked up a mk25 not too long ago and i was kinda shocked at the results. at the same distance i shot the mk25 the grouping was the size of a silver dollar to a fist. the mk25 feels good in the hand, trigger is nice, bright night sights, but i perform alot better with the 92fs. does anyone who shoots both guns has similar experience? please dont flame me for this but for half the price id get another 92fs i feel that it has a crisp trigger break.....i like my sig mk25, looks awsome, nice finish, awesome night sights, nice rail, nice trigger but i dont know if it was worth my $835

Comment