Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off roster 'lending'
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
You can certainly act in your own best interests, as you perceive them.Since no one has rebutted with a citation to the contrary or explained why the reading of the code is in error (with supporting citation) then it is prudent to operate under the assumption that loan of an off roster gun is not allowed.
Of course, reasonable folk agree that a spouse can utilize the weapons at hand for HD but the PC is not reasonable or so clearly indicative of supporting such actions. Prosecutor is gonna prosecute ... why give them an opening?
And, even though a misdemeanor is 'only' subject to up to a year in county jail, everyone I know thinks that would be a serious problem.
Now, find one case in California where this situation has been to court. That I don't know about one is not the gauge - I don't see everything. And if a case has never been brought, that does not indicate that a case could not be brought.
But even murder is cleared by arrest about 65% annually, and police and other LEO devote lots of resources to solving those.
I'd worry more about being struck by lightning - 1 in CA in 2013, 1 in CA in 2012.
Seems that this thread has gone as far as is needed; OP has made a decision satisfactory to himself.Last edited by Librarian; 11-11-2013, 12:37 AM.ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page
Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,861,042
Posts: 25,076,164
Members: 355,125
Active Members: 5,373
Welcome to our newest member, GJag.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 5040 users online. 150 members and 4890 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment