Currently own a Springfield 1911 TRP Operator, it's a beast I love the weight and performance but after some training and evaluation I have realized I may need another option.
What I've found is that this handgun needs to be lubed at all times or it won't cycle properly, unless it's just the Fiocchi 230gr FMJs and Black Hills steel case 185gr JHPs. Obviously if I'm using it everyday I would maintain it and shouldn't have any problems. But it is not good for concealed carry with the Viridian X5L.
Although it is a perfect duty/field handgun I can't help but think about all the Glock torture tests. I feel like I should compliment my full size .45 1911 with a slightly more concealable and ultra reliable Glock. This way I can carry the Glock knowing that when I do need to use it it WILL work and won't matter if I didn't lube it the day before. That is if all the torture tests results are true and that the Glock is as reliable as it is portrayed to be.
I'm not sure if I should stick with .45 and get a G21/G30. This way I only have to train with and stock/load one handgun caliber. But adopting a 9mm G17/G19 would allow me to use 9mm if .45 is unavailable. Before my 1911 I owned an HK USP .40, and I did not like how the .40 will snap randomly at different angles compred to a .45 that recoils straight back and up. I have shot a friends Ruger 9mm and it seemed snappy but not excessive like the .40.
What would you go with and why? Do you think Glocks are more reliable than other models in general? What are you thoughts on sticking with just .45 or adding 9mm? I own an AR and M1A so I've already got multiple calibers even though before these bills I was planning on consolidating to an LMT MWSE. Now it seems I had better keep what I have and get more so I have them for backups and for friends/family. Also if you own a TRP Operator or Glock what ammo are you shooting? I've read that people claim 9mm these days can match up to a .45 but only if you exclude modern .45 bullets/loads. A main factor that determined my 1911 purchase was that a major advantage to 9mm is more firepower/higher capacity magazines but we are in CA which basically renders that advantage useless.
What I've found is that this handgun needs to be lubed at all times or it won't cycle properly, unless it's just the Fiocchi 230gr FMJs and Black Hills steel case 185gr JHPs. Obviously if I'm using it everyday I would maintain it and shouldn't have any problems. But it is not good for concealed carry with the Viridian X5L.
Although it is a perfect duty/field handgun I can't help but think about all the Glock torture tests. I feel like I should compliment my full size .45 1911 with a slightly more concealable and ultra reliable Glock. This way I can carry the Glock knowing that when I do need to use it it WILL work and won't matter if I didn't lube it the day before. That is if all the torture tests results are true and that the Glock is as reliable as it is portrayed to be.
I'm not sure if I should stick with .45 and get a G21/G30. This way I only have to train with and stock/load one handgun caliber. But adopting a 9mm G17/G19 would allow me to use 9mm if .45 is unavailable. Before my 1911 I owned an HK USP .40, and I did not like how the .40 will snap randomly at different angles compred to a .45 that recoils straight back and up. I have shot a friends Ruger 9mm and it seemed snappy but not excessive like the .40.
What would you go with and why? Do you think Glocks are more reliable than other models in general? What are you thoughts on sticking with just .45 or adding 9mm? I own an AR and M1A so I've already got multiple calibers even though before these bills I was planning on consolidating to an LMT MWSE. Now it seems I had better keep what I have and get more so I have them for backups and for friends/family. Also if you own a TRP Operator or Glock what ammo are you shooting? I've read that people claim 9mm these days can match up to a .45 but only if you exclude modern .45 bullets/loads. A main factor that determined my 1911 purchase was that a major advantage to 9mm is more firepower/higher capacity magazines but we are in CA which basically renders that advantage useless.


Comment