I am in the market for a .45 ACP and have a 30SF on order...but (with the current state of things) I have had a lot of time to think about it and I often find myself questioning the 30SF's sub-compact size and consider changing my order to a 21SF.
I am (for the most part) committed to Glock and feel a compact would have been the perfect size, but since they don't make a compact in .45 ACP--here I am.
To share a few relevant points:
1. Would you recommend the 30 or 21?
2. Or would I be better off opening up to other brands and getting a 4" barrel .45?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave
I am (for the most part) committed to Glock and feel a compact would have been the perfect size, but since they don't make a compact in .45 ACP--here I am.
To share a few relevant points:
- I don't have the opportunity to shoot them (or even hold them)
- This is not for CCW. It's for home defense and range
- I am not a big guy. 5'9", smaller hands
- I don't want to deal with excessive recoil
- I also don't want a monster that is too big to be comfortable in my hands
1. Would you recommend the 30 or 21?
2. Or would I be better off opening up to other brands and getting a 4" barrel .45?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Dave


).

Comment