Tweet
S&W 442 internal lock "reverse failure"?
Hoping I might be able to get some advice on a matter of "reverse gun-safety" so to speak.
I've been interested in purchasing a S&W 442 for a while now and with the huge spike in purchases nationwide (especially with the new NY law that limits magazines to 7 rounds), now is as good a time as any.
That said, maybe some of you here can offer some advice. S&W makes two models of the 442. One with an internal lock (SKU 162810) and one without (SKU 150544). Here in CA the 442 with lock is listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale while the current 442 without internal lock is not (there is a no-lock 442 listed on the Roster with the SKU 102810, but S&W tells me that's an old and discontinued version).
I was hoping to purchase the model without the lock but unless they approve the current non-lock model after this year's SHOT Show, I may have to settle for the locking model.
So let me ask, have there been any instances of the internal locks accidentally switching on? Say you're shooting the gun and the recoil jars something loose in the locking mechanism and switches it on. Possibly in the middle of a gunfight, thus turning the gun into a paperweight.
I don't plan on shooting any +P or +P+ ammo in it. In fact I plan to use standard pressure low recoil ammo to make it easier to handle. But I still fear the safety sort of "reverse failing" by switching on when I may need the gun. Here's the article where I got this impression from:
Hope I can get some good advice to whether my fears are founded. Safeties on a gun can help prevent accidental discharge and a safety that fails and accidentally switches off could cause a negligent discharge. But the opposite can be true too right? An internal safety that needs a key to operate sounds like it could reverse-fail by switching on from the jarring of the recoil while you're fighting for your life in a shootout with an intruder (or mugger if you have a CCW) and render the gun useless. I'm hoping this is just a theory and hasn't actually happened.
I've been interested in purchasing a S&W 442 for a while now and with the huge spike in purchases nationwide (especially with the new NY law that limits magazines to 7 rounds), now is as good a time as any.
That said, maybe some of you here can offer some advice. S&W makes two models of the 442. One with an internal lock (SKU 162810) and one without (SKU 150544). Here in CA the 442 with lock is listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale while the current 442 without internal lock is not (there is a no-lock 442 listed on the Roster with the SKU 102810, but S&W tells me that's an old and discontinued version).
I was hoping to purchase the model without the lock but unless they approve the current non-lock model after this year's SHOT Show, I may have to settle for the locking model.
So let me ask, have there been any instances of the internal locks accidentally switching on? Say you're shooting the gun and the recoil jars something loose in the locking mechanism and switches it on. Possibly in the middle of a gunfight, thus turning the gun into a paperweight.
I don't plan on shooting any +P or +P+ ammo in it. In fact I plan to use standard pressure low recoil ammo to make it easier to handle. But I still fear the safety sort of "reverse failing" by switching on when I may need the gun. Here's the article where I got this impression from:
Hope I can get some good advice to whether my fears are founded. Safeties on a gun can help prevent accidental discharge and a safety that fails and accidentally switches off could cause a negligent discharge. But the opposite can be true too right? An internal safety that needs a key to operate sounds like it could reverse-fail by switching on from the jarring of the recoil while you're fighting for your life in a shootout with an intruder (or mugger if you have a CCW) and render the gun useless. I'm hoping this is just a theory and hasn't actually happened.
Comment