Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

C&R FFL + COE Exemption Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • timmy8151
    Member
    • Mar 2003
    • 412

    C&R FFL + COE Exemption Help

    I have been having a hard time convincing my FFL that my C&R FFL + COE will exempt me from the 1 handgun a month rule.

    I've directed them to pg 33-34 of the 2007 California Firearms booklet as well as PC Section 12072. (a) (9) (A). I told them that neither section specifically states that the use of the C&R + COE for the exemption applies only to C&R Handguns.

    However, my FFL has called the DOJ/BOF about this issue as was told that she could only apply this exemption to C&R handguns.

    Does anyone have anything in writing from the DOJ/BOF one way or another about this.

    Thanks
  • #2
    stevie
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 3856

    Try item #24 on the FAQ

    Comment

    • #3
      scootergmc
      Veteran Member
      • Mar 2006
      • 4089

      Here you go timmy, the actual code section is 12072(a)(9)(B)(ix) (the FAQs list the wrong code section):

      (9) (A) No person shall make an application to purchase more than
      one pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed
      upon the person within any 30-day period.
      (B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any of the following:

      (ix) Any person who is licensed as a collector pursuant to Chapter
      44 (commencing with Section 921) of Title 18 of the United States
      Code and the regulations issued pursuant thereto and who has a
      current certificate of eligibility issued to him or her by the
      Department of Justice pursuant to Section 12071.
      It does not state anything specific to C&Rs. Therefore, it's not specific to C&Rs. Good luck getting someone at BOF to back you. I do know that it is a valid exemption. There are a few on this board who have used their COE and C&R to get around the 1 per 30 day.
      Last edited by scootergmc; 01-31-2008, 1:05 PM.

      Comment

      • #4
        timmy8151
        Member
        • Mar 2003
        • 412

        Originally posted by stevie
        Showed them that too. My FFL won't apply the exemption because of their discussion with the BOF.

        Comment

        • #5
          timmy8151
          Member
          • Mar 2003
          • 412

          Originally posted by kimbercarry
          why not call yourself.if they give you the wrong answer point out the law.if they give you the right answer tell your dealer to call that person
          I have called in the past and cited the correct section of the penal code, but was fed the same BS about it applying to C&R handguns only.

          Comment

          • #6
            scootergmc
            Veteran Member
            • Mar 2006
            • 4089

            You can always call again and ask them where it says it specifically applies. They won't be able to tell you.

            Comment

            • #7
              SecondAmendmentgirl
              Member
              • Jan 2008
              • 259

              Yeah, the website FAQ says C&R only and the consecutive numbered situation but nothing else. LOL - California .gov doesn't want you to own a hangun, let alone 2 or more in one month

              Make a formal request in writing, as I've heard the answers at CA DOJ vary depending on who picks up the phone, from day to day and hour to hour.
              Lisa

              Comment

              • #8
                kap
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2006
                • 1324

                The only time I did it I had the FFL tell me that the cited code goes against everything the DOJ has told them regarding C&R + COE waiting period exemptions. They did the the transfer anyway and it went through with no problems.

                It would be nice to have an opinion from the DOJ in writing one way or the other as their stated opinion seems is in conflict with the code. At least it will give us something with which to work.
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #9
                  paradox
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 3588

                  underground legislation?

                  Paging Gene...
                  * Freedom is the human right to live your life however you damn well please, so long as you don't interfere with another's right to do the same.
                  * "Don't believe them, don't fear them, don't ask anything of them." --Alexander Solzhenitsyn

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    vrylak
                    Member
                    • Dec 2005
                    • 495

                    my apologies for resurrecting an old thread. don't want to start another since my question still pertains to this.

                    For a C&R and COE holder who has a handgun on DROS, still within the 30 day periond, if you want to DROS another handgun at another FFL/store, do you need to inform them that you're claiming the 30-day exemption, or is that exemption automatic, meaning DOJ knows about your C&R and COE. Handguns are modern by the way and not C&R.

                    Thanks
                    Always be in Doubt.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      sevans
                      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                      CGN Contributor
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 962

                      You'll need to inform the FFL since they need to process the DROS as 30-day exempt. If it is submitted as a non-exempt DROS the DOJ will reject the second purchase if it's within 30 days.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Scout106
                        Member
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 270

                        My dealer called DOJ and got the same misinformation, which he relayed to me while still on the phone. I asked him to get the DOJ agents name and phone extension or to let me speak to her/him. When he asked for the info, they changed their position and told the dealer it was "the legal intent" to restrict us. My reply was that intent has no bearing in statute law. I got my guns.
                        sigpic RVN 01May66 - 15Jun67

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1