Glock 26 vs. Sig P365 & 43X – Concealed Carry Comparison (my thoughts)

[xounlistedxox]

As a still somewhat recent owner of the P365 and having spent decades owning, shooting, carrying Glocks I wanted to share some thoughts on comparing the P365 (micro) to the Glock 26 one of the OG's in the sub-compact realm.

This comparison doesn't consider that you can swap the grip frame of the P365 around, it's a comparison of it as is to the G26.

For those like myself who may have thought "why would I need/want a P365" when you already have every Glock known to man? 🤔

TLDR, for those that would rather read about it than watch the video: 👀

Size & Concealment

• P365 is noticeably thinner and lighter, making it easier to conceal for many folks.
• Glock 26 has a thicker grip, which may be better for shooters with larger hands, or men 😅 (I kid, I kid) dataurl830265.gif

Capacity

• Both offer similar standard capacity (10+1), with the ability to use OEM extended magazines. Sig does a better job with OEM mag bases that fill the gap for longer clips.
• Both platforms support a wide range of aftermarket mags and baseplates. (just seeing if you're actually reading by using the word clips above 😁)

Shooting Performance

• The Glock 26 feels softer shooting and quicker back on target, thanks to its heavier slide soaking up more recoil/muzzle flip.💪
• The P365 is still very controllable, but has a snappier feel due to its smaller & thinner frame.

Ergonomics

• P365 grip is compact, ideal for concealment but can feel small in the hand. I wear a size L glove for reference.
• Glock 26 offers a different grip profile that may feel more natural for medium/large+ hands.

Customization & Features

• P365 comes with a rail for lights/lasers, giving it the edge in stock features.
• Glock 26 benefits from the massive aftermarket and consistency with the rest of the Glock lineup.

Not Mentioned in the Video

• The G26 & all Glocks are much easier and more straightforward to work on.

Final Thoughts

• P365 → Best for maximum concealability with modern features right out of the box.
• Glock 26 → Best for Glock fans who value consistency, softer recoil, and deep aftermarket support.

At the end of the day, you can’t go wrong with either pistol, both are proven, reliable carry guns. Share your thoughts below!



Figured since I'm comparing the Sig to another Glock I'd keep it in the same thread!




P365 vs Glock 43X

TLDR for those that would rather read about it than watch the video:

Ran a direct comparison between Sig P365 and Glock 43X.

Concealability: Slight edge to the P365 (shorter OAL; similar width).

Capacity (OEM): P365 wins—multiple OEM mag sizes/capacities.

43X OEM is 10-rd. Recoil/Control: 43X feels a bit softer and quicker back on target.

Tested with/without an Omega comp; even without it, the Glock’s backstrap hump sits nicely in the palm.

Ergonomics: Hand-dependent. 43X backstrap shape works well for many; P365 is slimmer.

Customization: Both strong; P365 gets the nod for modular grip modules/frames.

Bottom line: Choose P365 for maximum concealability + OEM mag flexibility + modularity.

Choose 43X for slightly softer recoil + Glock ecosystem familiarity. Curious what others prefer for CCW between these two and why. (Video has shooting clips if you want to see the recoil difference.)

[smokycuh]

I have both and always carry the p365 more since its almost better in every way. Other than nostalgia of glock.

[enorbit3]

I carried a G26 for about a year until i got a Shield. Then switched to the shield. Now I carry a shield plus. Also have a p365 xmacro, but the shield gets ALL of the carry

[xounlistedxox]

I have both and always carry the p365 more since its almost better in every way. Other than nostalgia of glock.

Many reports of trigger return spring breakage fairly regularly on the P365 it seems. Never had an issue like that on my Glocks, in decades of use. That's my main concern at this point.

[acaligunner]

Many reports of trigger return spring breakage fairly regularly on the P365 it seems. Never had an issue like that on my Glocks, in decades of use. That's my main concern at this point.

I saw that ( trigger return spring breakage ) on YouTube and since I have a 365 I would order extra oem parts - also my magazines are rusting, and I do take regular care of what I carry.

I have yet to have any issues on my G 26 or G 19’s.

The extra advantage on the Glocks over the 365 is mag compatibility, and durability.

[smokycuh]

Many reports of trigger return spring breakage fairly regularly on the P365 it seems. Never had an issue like that on my Glocks, in decades of use. That's my main concern at this point.

i did read about those issues as well but i guess just really need to keep an eye on it after each range trip
the glock you can just never clean or inspect it and it goes boom
also glock can be bone dry and fire i don't dare try that with the p365 though

[xounlistedxox]

i did read about those issues as well but i guess just really need to keep an eye on it after each range trip
the glock you can just never clean or inspect it and it goes boom
also glock can be bone dry and fire i don't dare try that with the p365 though

Yeah, while the spring is not difficult to change, it's not like you would be able to do it in the middle of a pew pew fight if you wound up with a dead trigger. Definitely a large concern, especially since I do so much dry fire, prematurely aging the spring, lol

[k1dude]

I have all 3 and prefer the Glock 43X MOS. It's my daily carry.

My G26 has the Strike Industries +2 mag extensions so my pinky doesn't hang off. It shoots the softest of the 3, probably because of the meatier grip and the SI extension which makes it 12+1. It's harder to conceal because of the thickness of the gun though.

My P365 X Macro is the snappiest to shoot, probably because of the higher bore axis. It's also the hardest of the 3 to rack. It's very stiff. It's slower than the other 2 for follow up shots, but it conceals nicely and has the best trigger. It uses the stock 12 round mags.

My G43X MOS uses the PSA 15 round flush fit mags. So for a comparable size profile, it carries 15+1 instead of the 12+1 of the other 2. It recoils more than the G26, but less than the P365. It's also simpler to work on and has more aftermarket goodies.

To the OP, your 43X shooting vid should not have included the attached comp. That was an unfair video to the P365.

[xounlistedxox]

I have all 3 and prefer the Glock 43X MOS. It's my daily carry.

My G26 has the Strike Industries +2 mag extensions so my pinky doesn't hang off. It shoots the softest of the 3, probably because of the meatier grip and the SI extension which makes it 12+1. It's harder to conceal because of the thickness of the gun though.

My P365 X Macro is the snappiest to shoot, probably because of the higher bore axis. It's also the hardest of the 3 to rack. It's very stiff. It's slower than the other 2 for follow up shots, but it conceals nicely and has the best trigger. It uses the stock 12 round mags.

My G43X MOS uses the PSA 15 round flush fit mags. So for a comparable size profile, it carries 15+1 instead of the 12+1 of the other 2. It recoils more than the G26, but less than the P365. It's also simpler to work on and has more aftermarket goodies.

To the OP, your 43X shooting vid should not have included the attached comp. That was an unfair video to the P365.

Great points, the P365 was also shot with and without comp, and I did bring it up in the video so that folks weren't confused by the footage alone

[acaligunner]

I often wonder about the statement “ easy to carry “ .
Back in the day ease of carry was an all steel or steel and aluminum framed pistols ( 1911’s or s&w’s 3913 ) or a 4-3” steel revolver.

Then the polymer Glocks came along ( yes I know H&K were one of the 1st ) and it was amazing ( lightweight ) was the key word. I carried a full sized G17 in az for years.

Now we have micro minis and we believe Glocks are too thick 🤔 🤣🤣.

I have a good Horsehide belt, along with a kydex holster and I’m good, even thinking about using a 5” 1911 -

It’s all in what you want to carry big or small - carrying is a discipline, how many times have we unloaded our gear at home - now you kinda know that carrying is 16 oz or more - if it was up to me I rather not carry a pound of gear but we strive on anyways

[xounlistedxox]

I often wonder about the statement “ easy to carry “ .
Back in the day ease of carry was an all steel or steel and aluminum framed pistols ( 1911’s or s&w’s 3913 ) or a 4-3” steel revolver.

Then the polymer Glocks came along ( yes I know H&K were one of the 1st ) and it was amazing ( lightweight ) was the key word. I carried a full sized G17 in az for years.

Now we have micro minis and we believe Glocks are too thick 🤔 🤣🤣.

I have a good Horsehide belt, along with a kydex holster and I’m good, even thinking about using a 5” 1911 -

It’s all in what you want to carry big or small - carrying is a discipline, how many times have we unloaded our gear at home - now you kinda know that carrying is 16 oz or more - if it was up to me I rather not carry a pound of gear but we strive on anyways

I can AIWB a Glock 17L or 34 if I really wanted to, but I don't really want to.

[acaligunner]

I can AIWB a Glock 17L or 34 if I really wanted to, but I don't really want to.

I carried a G17 in Kramer gear for 5+ years in AZ, not too bad, then again I carried a full sized 5” 1911 for a few years before the Glocks ever hit the local gun shops. Those were in a Milt Sparks summer special 🙂.

[Snoopy47]

I have owned all three of these. Currently no longer a G26 owner. It was one of my recent sales, and it was on my CCW too.

I will always agree a Glock is a solid go to CCW choice, and while I don't have the G26 on mine anymore I do have the 43. I'll be going to a 43X next renewal (capacity and RED DOT).

The P365 just has so much more Carry utility going for it.

I don't hold "shoot-ability" in such high regard as others might. It's upon each one of us to be competent with our chosen carry. I do think the TRIGGER of the P365 out of the box is a bazillion times better than the Glocks of discussion, and I have the bottom rung P365, not the straight trigger. So yea, the Glocks are better in the hand because they are a little larger, but the P365 trigger more than makes up for that.

Now........... when comparing "shoot ability" Remember, most of us get at least THREE CCW choices. SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO my third is a 1911. SO BOOM!!!!!!!! There ya go.
BUT YEA!!!!!!!!!!! It's my range duty carry. I'm not in the grocery store with it.

I agree
P365 will be on my CCW
Glock of any kind will be on my CCW.

Each plays a role in the CCW world.

I GUESS THE MAIN philosophy I'm going with nowadays is (folks can disagree, and I expect they will):

Whatever choice one goes with for CCW I'm personally deciding to BUY those product offerings that are 100% out OUT OF THE BOX solutions with next to 0% modifications. If I'm caught up in a CCW sceanrio I'm going to have: OEM FRAME, OEM BARREL, OEM TRIGGER, OEM MAGAZINES. The Red Dot will be mounted to an OEM designed Red Dot compatible slide.

I want 10+1 rounds. I want red dot capable, and I want it concealable. SIG provides that out of the box and on the Roster. One has to work around the roster for Glock.

[naz]

If only Glock made a gen 3 mos “spare slide” for g26

would be nice to have that oem option for Glock ccw fans.

[xounlistedxox]

If only Glock made a gen 3 mos “spare slide” for g26

would be nice to have that oem option for Glock ccw fans.

Agreed, although the Gen 3 Spare Slides went up in price sharply since they released them.

I wound up grabbing a Gen 5 G26 MOS slide for one of mine. Had a local shop cut one of my other G26's, and have another completely stock G26