As far as I'm aware, nobody has been able to actually replicate the problem in their tests. Therefore they don't know what to change in the design, or if anything actually needs to be changed. Its always easy to say a company doesn't care, the CEO should be fired, etc., (and I'm not saying that isn't the case here), but stop and think about it...If Sig knows there is an actual problem that they can address even if it costs them 10s of millions, is it really plausible that they would continue to expand the pool of liability by continuing to offer the product, when down the line if someone proved a design flaw the losses would much higher? Just pondering the issue. They could just quietly stop offering them for public sale and complete any contracts they have and call it quits, replacing them with a new model or just continuing to sell the hell out of 365 variants. Depending on configuration (XL, Fuse, AXG frame, weights, etc) the 365 really has no downside compared to a 320 for civilian and even LEO use. Who knows, maybe they'll do this.
I have a few 320s, and I've never had a problem, they are great shooters, but I am open to any actual performance test data and like many feel that where there's smoke there is quite possibly fire. So we all sit waiting for more test data and explanations. I have not seen any update on the US Airman who was initially reported to have been killed by a 320 UD, other than another service member was arrested. I would like to know every detail of the actual incident.
I have a few 320s, and I've never had a problem, they are great shooters, but I am open to any actual performance test data and like many feel that where there's smoke there is quite possibly fire. So we all sit waiting for more test data and explanations. I have not seen any update on the US Airman who was initially reported to have been killed by a 320 UD, other than another service member was arrested. I would like to know every detail of the actual incident.
Comment