Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Whats with California and the Gen 4 Glocks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • deoxys987
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 832

    Whats with California and the Gen 4 Glocks?

    why dont stores like turners, bass pro or local gunshops sell the new Gen 4 Glocks? Is there something about it thats not legal or what? or do the gen 4 only have hicap mags? whats with CA and those new glocks???
    1937 S/42 P.08 Luger
    1939 Tula TT-33
    1939 Erma RC Mauser 98k
    1942 "B" Barrel M/91
    1943 Izhevsk 91/30 PU Sniper
    1957 Tula SKS
    Hungarian Border Force AK-55 Reweld
    1968 "Late-date" Finnish M39
    sigpic
  • #2
    hunteran
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 575

    Not on the roster.

    Comment

    • #3
      PandaLuv
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 641

      Lol welcome to ca.


      Gen4 glocks are off roster, they are 100% legal to own and buy through PPT or SSE. Though they cannot be sold through FFLs as on roster handguns.
      Молон Лабе
      I'd rather be carried by 6 than judged by 12

      Comment

      • #4
        deoxys987
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 832

        Originally posted by hunteran
        Not on the roster.
        Haven't they been out for a while? I wouldve thought they would have been on the roster by now. When do they update the roster? The first of the year or what?
        1937 S/42 P.08 Luger
        1939 Tula TT-33
        1939 Erma RC Mauser 98k
        1942 "B" Barrel M/91
        1943 Izhevsk 91/30 PU Sniper
        1957 Tula SKS
        Hungarian Border Force AK-55 Reweld
        1968 "Late-date" Finnish M39
        sigpic

        Comment

        • #5
          Duranimal
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2011
          • 1062

          No mag disconnect no lci indicator so no gen4 on roster. Take a look at the 229 enhanced elite compared to a standard 229 and see how ca defiles handguns
          "I'd much rather go to my grave never needing my gun, than go there wishing I had it"

          Comment

          • #6
            ckprax
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2011
            • 1496

            They will never be on the roster; no lci or mag disconnect.

            Comment

            • #7
              tacticalcity
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Aug 2006
              • 10916

              Originally posted by deoxys987
              Haven't they been out for a while? I wouldve thought they would have been on the roster by now. When do they update the roster? The first of the year or what?
              Doesn't work that way. They will likely never be on the roster. They do not meet the specific design requirements set forth by California. Many if not most new handguns will never make the roster for that reason. California is trying to dictate to the gun companies how they must design their guns, with features like magazine disconnects and other things. Many if not most gun companies have decided not to comply.

              For years, California has been extorting gun companies in order to get onto the approved handgun roster. They went too far by dictating that gun companies completely change their designs. The gun companies have had it with California, and I don't blame them. We are just one state, and a very liberal anti-gun state at that. If they bend to the wishes of this state, they set a dangerous precident. Pretty soon they will be designing completely useless guns so overloaded with "safety features" they no longer function at all. Politicians are not engineers, they need to stay out of designing guns.
              Last edited by tacticalcity; 05-07-2012, 7:03 PM.

              Comment

              • #8
                deoxys987
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2011
                • 832

                Originally posted by PandaLuv
                Lol welcome to ca.


                Gen4 glocks are off roster, they are 100% legal to own and buy through PPT or SSE. Though they cannot be sold through FFLs as on roster handguns.
                I've seen some of the gen 4 in LEO shops, they're nice! So what you're saying they're not on the illegal and not on the approved roster?
                1937 S/42 P.08 Luger
                1939 Tula TT-33
                1939 Erma RC Mauser 98k
                1942 "B" Barrel M/91
                1943 Izhevsk 91/30 PU Sniper
                1957 Tula SKS
                Hungarian Border Force AK-55 Reweld
                1968 "Late-date" Finnish M39
                sigpic

                Comment

                • #9
                  shayski
                  Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 199

                  they are on the off list in ca. what happened is ca is suck a democratic nazi that they are now making gun manufactures submit the gun design and they need to be approved. there are specific requirements they must meet. well most major manufactures said f you ca we will sell everywhere else. so what you need to do is find a ffl thats doing ca compliant mods. In the case of the gen 4 glock its a longer (lone wolf) barrel to meet ca over all length requirements. then a mag mod making it a single shot.
                  Glock 34 Sig Stainless 1911 Railed

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    PandaLuv
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 641

                    Originally posted by deoxys987
                    I've seen some of the gen 4 in LEO shops, they're nice! So what you're saying they're not on the illegal and not on the approved roster?
                    They are just no approved to sell through FFLs, meaning FFls can't sell them to the public. FFLs can only sell them to LEOs or civilians via Single Shot Exemption. You can get a gen 4 through an LEO or any other person that already has one through Private Party Transfer, or through an FFL that does SSE.


                    Honestly though, I had the gen 4 and sold it within few month, gen 3 is better, the only thing I liked about gen4 is different back straps and that's it.
                    Молон Лабе
                    I'd rather be carried by 6 than judged by 12

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      PandaLuv
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 641

                      Originally posted by tacticalcity
                      Doesn't work that way. They will likely never be on the roster. They do not meet the specific design requirements set forth by California. Many if not most new handguns will never make the roster for that reason. California is trying to dictate to the gun companies how they must design their guns, with features like magazine disconnects and other things. Many if not most gun companies have decided not to comply.

                      For years, California has been extorting gun companies in order to get onto the approved handgun roster. They went too far by dictating that gun companies completely change their designs. The gun companies have had it with California, and I don't blame them. We are just one state, and a very liberal anti-gun state at that. If they bend to the wishes of this state, they set a dangerous precident. Pretty soon they will be designing completely useless guns so overloaded with "safety features" they no longer function at all. Politicians are not engineers, they need to stay out of designing guns.
                      So true

                      Like someone said, the elite looks so hideous and I love p22x series.

                      You gotta give it up to SSE FFLs, it's great to know that people fighting for out right.
                      Молон Лабе
                      I'd rather be carried by 6 than judged by 12

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Zula
                        Member
                        • Apr 2012
                        • 109

                        Awful for the gun companies as they are losing 40 million potential customers.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          tacticalcity
                          I need a LIFE!!
                          • Aug 2006
                          • 10916

                          Originally posted by Zula
                          Awful for the gun companies as they are losing 40 million potential customers.
                          No they are not loosing us as customers. Because with an hours drive anywhere within California you can find a dealer that offers SSE conversions to get around the roster.

                          Even if they did loose all of California, it would not hurt them at all. Their customer base is international. It is extremely arrogant of California to even attempt this nonesense. We make up such a tiny percentage of their customer base. One state trying to dictate policy to companies that sell world wide is ridiculous. It was a non-starter.

                          The only one suffering here is the State Government. They loose out on the money they used to be able to extort from the gun companies as fewer and fewer play ball. The problem here is that the politicians bought into their own lie. The roster was never about making sure guns were safe, it was about an additional way to raise revenue. Somewhere along the line they started to believe their own propganda. Their loss.
                          Last edited by tacticalcity; 05-07-2012, 7:34 PM.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            deoxys987
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2011
                            • 832

                            Originally posted by PandaLuv
                            They are just no approved to sell through FFLs, meaning FFls can't sell them to the public. FFLs can only sell them to LEOs or civilians via Single Shot Exemption. You can get a gen 4 through an LEO or any other person that already has one through Private Party Transfer, or through an FFL that does SSE.


                            Honestly though, I had the gen 4 and sold it within few month, gen 3 is better, the only thing I liked about gen4 is different back straps and that's it.
                            let me ask a hypothetical question. lets say i have a LEO friend and he buys a gen 4 and doesnt like it and wants to sell it, would a civilian be able to buy the gen 4 from a LEO from a FFL or private party transfer?
                            1937 S/42 P.08 Luger
                            1939 Tula TT-33
                            1939 Erma RC Mauser 98k
                            1942 "B" Barrel M/91
                            1943 Izhevsk 91/30 PU Sniper
                            1957 Tula SKS
                            Hungarian Border Force AK-55 Reweld
                            1968 "Late-date" Finnish M39
                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              NorCalK9.com
                              Veteran Member
                              • Sep 2010
                              • 3958

                              California is STUPID!
                              K.N.P.V. line malinois.
                              Like my AR but LOVE myAK
                              https://m.facebook.com/NorCal-K-9-137536682986716/
                              Our dogs bite
                              Malinois n Dutch shep pups available all ages Working homes only.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1