I'd like to purchase my first handgun soon but ran into a problem after I rented the two I thought I had narrowed it down to at a range.
1st is a mid-size compact 9mm
1) I picked it up and the thing points itself right where it should.
2) I had 56/60 shots land in the 10 @ about 8 yards (thought I was doing terrific and THIS IS THE ONE). 4 were about 1" high.
3) Trigger reset is awesome.
4) Hand fits just fine on the grip.
2nd is a sub-compact 9mm
1) I was concerned about my pinky not having a spot on the grip.
2) I picked it up and held it out at the target and the muzzle is low, so I have to bring it up to align properly at the target.
3) The trigger reset is much longer than the mid-size, but had I shot the guns in the opposite order I may not have noticed it as easily.
4) I landed every single shot in the 10 ring @ the same distance...
I've read the sub-compact brand has "better" sights than the other brand. Is it possible that the difference in results is only because of the sights?
There is an $80 trigger upgrade for the sub-compact that makes it much better (according to reviews) and there are many options for sights on the mid-size.
Given the decision to make yourself do you go with the one that you actually shoot better (and eventually upgrade the trigger) or the one with the trigger you prefer and eventually upgrade sights???
The sub-compact is $50 cheaper, so with the trigger its $30 more than the other stock.
1st is a mid-size compact 9mm
1) I picked it up and the thing points itself right where it should.
2) I had 56/60 shots land in the 10 @ about 8 yards (thought I was doing terrific and THIS IS THE ONE). 4 were about 1" high.
3) Trigger reset is awesome.
4) Hand fits just fine on the grip.
2nd is a sub-compact 9mm
1) I was concerned about my pinky not having a spot on the grip.
2) I picked it up and held it out at the target and the muzzle is low, so I have to bring it up to align properly at the target.
3) The trigger reset is much longer than the mid-size, but had I shot the guns in the opposite order I may not have noticed it as easily.
4) I landed every single shot in the 10 ring @ the same distance...
I've read the sub-compact brand has "better" sights than the other brand. Is it possible that the difference in results is only because of the sights?
There is an $80 trigger upgrade for the sub-compact that makes it much better (according to reviews) and there are many options for sights on the mid-size.
Given the decision to make yourself do you go with the one that you actually shoot better (and eventually upgrade the trigger) or the one with the trigger you prefer and eventually upgrade sights???
The sub-compact is $50 cheaper, so with the trigger its $30 more than the other stock.

Comment