Specifically, a Glock with round chambered vs. 1911 (condition 1) as a carry gun, both in a holster. It seems that I more often hear people claiming that the Glock design is inherently safer than the 1911. Without the external safety of a 1911, what exactly is the benefit of the "safe-action" Glock trigger?
And yes, I know the most important safety is between your ears. Let's assume the operator is serious about gun safety, and just focus on the mechanical/technical aspects of safe carry.
And yes, I know the most important safety is between your ears. Let's assume the operator is serious about gun safety, and just focus on the mechanical/technical aspects of safe carry.
Comment