A few weeks ago I was trying to decide which one to buy between these two. I initially chose to get the 30SF since it would be easier to ccw. But then I figured that the full sized gun would offer more accuracy and less recoil compared to the compact version (from my experience with 1911's). Hence I picked up the 21SF. When I took it to the range for the first time, the guy in the lane next to me had a 30SF so we took turns shooting each other's gun. I was surprised that I shot his 30SF better than my 21SF. My groups were much tighter past 10 yards and I swear the recoil of the smaller gun was in fact LESS than its big brother. 
Am I smoking crack or has anyone else experienced the same thing??? Now I'm having a bit of buyer's remorse since I should have went with my initial decision. I don't want to sell my 21SF so it looks like I'll be picking up a 30SF once the 30-day wait is up. It's a shame too since I already picked up a MTAC for the 21SF, which I'll never carry once I get the 30SF.

Am I smoking crack or has anyone else experienced the same thing??? Now I'm having a bit of buyer's remorse since I should have went with my initial decision. I don't want to sell my 21SF so it looks like I'll be picking up a 30SF once the 30-day wait is up. It's a shame too since I already picked up a MTAC for the 21SF, which I'll never carry once I get the 30SF.
Comment