Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

A different take on the "Locked Container"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Southpaw1969
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 6

    A different take on the "Locked Container"

    Can someone who really knows, chime in on this idea;

    Instead of having a pistol with no round chambered, and no magazine inserted in a locked container, what about having the same pistol having its slide locked back and a cable lock through the action, placed into an unlocked container such as a soft zippered gun case, or similar?

    For all practical purposes, this is the same thing. But, I know that sometimes laws can be very specific, and why take a chance!

    Any ruling on this?
  • #2
    Turo
    Calguns Addict
    • May 2009
    • 5066

    That would be an unlocked concealed handgun. The cable lock through the action does not a locked container make.

    The law is pretty specific that the container be locked. A lock through the action does nothing legally.
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
    -Thomas Jefferson

    Comment

    • #3
      Oceanbob
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Jun 2010
      • 12720

      No. Not in the PC at all and you would have serious problems.

      Funny how many people think that cable lock is for transporting handguns. It's not. It is to keep kids from loading or messing with the gun at home. Nothing more.

      The law is specific. Unloaded in a secure locked case only.






      Originally posted by Southpaw1969
      Can someone who really knows, chime in on this idea;

      Instead of having a pistol with no round chambered, and no magazine inserted in a locked container, what about having the same pistol having its slide locked back and a cable lock through the action, placed into an unlocked container such as a soft zippered gun case, or similar?

      For all practical purposes, this is the same thing. But, I know that sometimes laws can be very specific, and why take a chance!

      Any ruling on this?
      May the Bridges I burn light the way.

      Life Is Not About Waiting For The Storm To Pass - Its About Learning To Dance In The Rain.

      Fewer people are killed with all rifles each year (323 in 2011) than with shotguns (356), hammers and clubs (496), and hands and feet (728).

      Comment

      • #4
        Cokebottle
        Seņor Member
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Oct 2009
        • 32373

        +1

        Please refer to the actual written law, rather than looking at someone's explanation of what is legal and stretching to "that is legal, and this is functionally identical, so it should be legal as well"

        Perhaps it SHOULD be legal, but PC12026.1 and PC12026.2, which provide the exemptions to PC12025 (concealed carry of a handgun) specifically state "Secure, locking container other than the glove box or utility compartment"
        - Rich

        Originally posted by dantodd
        A just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.

        Comment

        • #5
          Southpaw1969
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2010
          • 6

          This is why I asked. I know that tiny details can make immense differences.

          No need to talk to me like I'm an idiot. I made no claim that I plan on doing this, or have done this. Just thinking out loud and wanted an answer.

          This also clearly shows that CA gun laws are generally written by people with <100 IQ's.

          Yes, I'm aware of the whole "brown paper bag" with lock argument, but many of the cases displayed in threads here are functionally identical. A soft sided laptop case can be defeated in 3 seconds with a butterknife.

          Comment

          • #6
            Cokebottle
            Seņor Member
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2009
            • 32373

            Originally posted by Southpaw1969
            This also clearly shows that CA gun laws are generally written by people with <100 IQ's.
            You've got that right.
            A soft sided laptop case can be defeated in 3 seconds with a butterknife.
            Personally, if the zipper is not metallic, I'm not comfortable with it.
            A solid range bag with a brass zipper and padlock? Ya... I'm comfortable with that.
            - Rich

            Originally posted by dantodd
            A just government will not be overthrown by force or violence because the people have no incentive to overthrow a just government. If a small minority of people attempt such an insurrection to grab power and enslave the people, the RKBA of the whole is our insurance against their success.

            Comment

            • #7
              Cali-Shooter
              Calguns Addict
              • Oct 2009
              • 9192

              Originally posted by Turo
              That would be an unlocked concealed handgun. The cable lock through the action does not a locked container make.

              The law is pretty specific that the container be locked. A lock through the action does nothing legally.
              You hit it right on the dot here; A cable lock through the action of a firearm fails to satisfy the law's requirement for a locked container.

              As used in Sections 17740, 23925, 25105, 25205, and 25610,
              and in Article 3 (commencing with Section 25505) of Chapter 2
              of Division 5 of Title 4, "locked container" means
              a secure container
              that is fully enclosed and
              locked by a padlock, keylock, combination lock, or similar
              locking device.

              The term "locked container" does not include the utility or
              glove compartment of a motor vehicle.
              From the Calguns Wiki:

              Secure container

              Secure is not defined in the Penal Code. The implication of the lock language suggests access to the handgun should be difficult without properly opening the lock. While this page cannot recommend brands or models, both hard-sided and soft-sided gun cases and other 'substantial' enclosures which can be locked would seem to fulfill the requirements of the law.
              Fully enclosed

              Fully enclosed is not defined in the Penal Code. This language does disallow the use of only a trigger lock or cable lock; locks without the fully-enclosing containers are not locked containers.


              According to the law, it implies that only a container which encloses the handgun within it and is lockable (and is locked while transporting the unloaded handgun) is acceptable while transporting it in CA otherwise you may face penal code violation charges if caught.
              In Glock We Trust.
              Originally posted by jeep7081
              My wife sleeps better knowing we have a zombie killer... Saiga AK47! Although my neighbor with his AR has restless nights.
              Originally posted by AleksandreCz
              Thank god the Federal Government is there to protect us from the Federal Government
              WTS: Revision 'Desert Locust' tactical Ballistic/Protective eyewear goggles NEW & USED pairs
              http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=737563

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1