Is there an advantage or benefit to having an unfluted cylinder on a revolver vs a fluted cylinder? Is the unfluted cylinder stronger for hot/heavy ammo loads? Any info is appreciated.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluted vs unfluted cylinder for revolver
Collapse
X
-
Pretty much what those dude said^^^^
Mostly cosmetics, some strength (slight), I went with a .44 mag vs 454 casuall just because the .44 has flutes and i liked the look.SA TRP Half rail, Glock 21SF, Spikes St-15, Ruger Alaskan .44, Saiga 7.62, GSSF Member
Diablo Rod & Gun Club
Originally posted by keenkeen"What you've just posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."Comment
-
Spreading the WORD according to COLT. and Smith, Wesson, Ruger, HK, Sig, High Standard, BrowningComment
-
If you shoot quickly an unfluted cylinder puts more strain on the action...because the journey is the worthier part...The Shepherd's TaleComment
-
-
I'm a sucker for the non-fluted cylinder. I like the clean look and it really is easier to clean.
It's my understanding that the flutes were 'added' to lighten the carry load. I remember seeing pictures of the older guns without the flutes when they were first introduced.
While they may be a little tougher on the action when firing double action, I don't believe that it's of any great significance.
Here's one....
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,854,029
Posts: 24,990,631
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 6,437
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 6262 users online. 117 members and 6145 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment