Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Body armor in CA?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SwPx4
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 253

    Body armor in CA?

    Is it legal? Will it be outlawed? And any recommendations?

    Most I have seen can handle most handgun calibers.. Thoughts?
  • #2
    jpham96
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 87

    its legal as long as you're not a felon or use it in the commission of a crime. you should be good

    Comment

    • #3
      SwPx4
      Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 253

      Cool. So is there a background check to buy? How would they know if someone was a felon?

      Comment

      • #4
        The Virus
        Banned
        • May 2011
        • 1135

        "they" would know..............

        Comment

        • #5
          JeremyS
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2010
          • 2014

          Originally posted by SwPx4
          Cool. So is there a background check to buy? How would they know if someone was a felon?
          Available online from plenty of places. Some will only sell to law enforcement, but some ship it like you're buying anything else online. They tend to be quite expensive.

          You can get level 1 stuff super cheap: http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/c....aspx?a=864990

          Claims to be the least expensive and also high quality: http://www.safeguardclothing.com/15-...sts-body-armor


          ^^^ all that said, I've never purchased one or spent any time researching brands so I'm certainly not endorsing anything.
          Escaped to WA

          sigpic

          My YouTube Channel

          Comment

          • #6
            SwPx4
            Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 253

            Lol. Im sure they would.


            Thanks guys.

            Any suggestions on brands or ballistics ratings?

            Comment

            • #7
              mlevans66
              Calguns Addict
              • Oct 2009
              • 9516

              If you can wait they sell them at gunshows.
              The liberal see's the glass as half full and tries to take more.
              The conservative see's glass as half empty and tries to keep it that way.
              I'm with the people on the side just pouring water in the glass trying to get a drink!

              Comment

              • #8
                NiteQwill
                Calguns Addict
                • Dec 2007
                • 6368

                I used to have an Eagle CIRAS, loved it for awhile. Then you realize it's much easier to go lighter.

                So I ditched my Army OTV and CIRAS and picked up an Eagle LCAV.

                The LCAV is a little different/difficult to don/dof but you get used to it. I uses Velocity BALCS IIIA and Velocity Level IV plates. It's so low profile you can wear it under normal clothes. Good combo with a tactical tailor suspension system.

                You can't even tell I'm wearing it:

                The fate of the wounded rest in the hands of the ones who apply the first dressing.

                Comment

                • #9
                  motorwerks
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 1619

                  wear something that can handle the round you shoot ie. if you shoot .45 you should be wearing a IIIa. If you only shoot .22 and don't expect to be shot by anything bigger then a .22 a Level I would do.
                  Last edited by motorwerks; 10-12-2011, 10:58 PM.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Maddog5150
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 10526

                    Originally posted by mlevans66
                    If you can wait they sell them at gunshows.
                    I've seen horrible deals at gunshows especially from that asian guy who keeps yelling out like a town cryer that body armor is going to be banned and that you should buy his sub par sloppily made armor that is over priced.

                    Brand-name bullet proof vests, clothing, tactical body armor, and accessories at discounted prices. Plus in-depth information on ballistic protection to put the odds in YOUR favor.


                    The used vests are a great deal and in reality, there is no experation on kevlar. It was an industry gimmick that served several purposes.
                    1. Liability in case there actually is a time when it falls apart.
                    2. It forces departments to buy armor again and thus making more money.
                    Buy my EO Tech XPS3-0!!!

                    For those nutjobs who like to use the word "gouge"
                    Note: I did not write the above article.

                    Any carpenters in Socal want a side project?

                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      five.five-six
                      CGN Contributor
                      • May 2006
                      • 34870

                      Originally posted by jpham96
                      its legal as long as you're not a felon or use it in the commission of a crime. you should be good
                      isn't everything in california a crime?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        JackOfBlades
                        Junior Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 74

                        Originally posted by Maddog5150
                        I've seen horrible deals at gunshows especially from that asian guy who keeps yelling out like a town cryer that body armor is going to be banned and that you should buy his sub par sloppily made armor that is over priced.

                        Brand-name bullet proof vests, clothing, tactical body armor, and accessories at discounted prices. Plus in-depth information on ballistic protection to put the odds in YOUR favor.


                        The used vests are a great deal and in reality, there is no experation on kevlar. It was an industry gimmick that served several purposes.
                        1. Liability in case there actually is a time when it falls apart.
                        2. It forces departments to buy armor again and thus making more money.




                        I'm not so sure it's a complete gimmick that vests expire. My understanding was that if you wear your vest a lot, over time the weaving will loosen and might lose the ability to stop bullets. Now who knows how long that would take and i do agree that manufacturers put a date on their to sell more vests. All I'm saying is if you wear a vest a lot, just be conscious of the condition the kevlars in.
                        Last edited by JackOfBlades; 10-12-2011, 11:13 PM.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Quiet
                          retired Goon
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 30242

                          The reason why it's recommended to replace bullet resistant vests every 5 years or so...
                          Heat, humidity, presperation, etc. overtime degrades the chemical composition of the the kevlar/spectra/etc. fibers used in bullet resistant bests, which reduces their effectiveness.
                          sigpic

                          "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            bigbob76
                            Veteran Member
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 3955

                            Originally posted by motorwerks
                            wear something that can handle the round you shoot ie. if you shoot .45 you should be wearing a IIIa. If you only shoot .22 and don't expect to be shot by anything bigger then a .22 a Level I would do.
                            Is this approach to protect yourself from yourself? Planning on a negligent discharge?
                            If you can't explain it simply you don't understand it well enough. Albert Einstein

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              motorwerks
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 1619

                              Originally posted by bigbob76
                              Is this approach to protect yourself from yourself? Planning on a negligent discharge?
                              Or someone taking your weapon.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1