I'm a Glock guy and new to Sigs. Are there Pros/Cons to either design?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference between internal/external extractor on Sig?
Collapse
X
-
Difference between internal/external extractor on Sig?
NRA, CGF, GSSF, SAF member
Certified Glock Armorer 2011, 2016
"Praise be to the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle. -Psalm 144:1Tags: None -
nope. both are robust and function just fine.
you will find the internal on old (W German) carbon slide P226, while the external will mostly be mounted on new machine slides P226.
the internal is easier to clean since it can be remove from the breach block. the external is very hard to remove since you will probably need a special tool to depress the plunger.
i personally like the internal one for the same reason as to the internal extractor on a 1911. where its shielded from external junk. but in reality, both system works fine for normal civilian usage.
the best external design i've seen are the one on the Beretta, there the plunger is not expose to outside contaminate. on the other hand, the expose external extractor design have been use for over 100 years (its on my Winchester 1897) so im sure its fine. -
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,870,634
Posts: 25,174,487
Members: 358,862
Active Members: 5,380
Welcome to our newest member, 1776 Arms.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 29251 users online. 122 members and 29129 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 11:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment