G21SF or USP45

[zarosfaltor]

Besides the obvious discrepancy in price, how do these two guns compare? I'm looking to get something in .45ACP and I pretty much have it down to these two. They seem similar in size and weight, and while the trigger systems are different, I would expect both to be competent, accurate, and reliable shooters. Also, does anyone know if any of the ranges in the Sacramento area rent either of these two pistols?

[RT13]

I think you've already answered your own question. These two guns have nothing in common other than that they have polymer frames. The HK is a SA/DA while the G21SF is strikerfire. G21 has lower bore aaxis which inherently helps with recoil vs the opposing high bore axis on the HK. The USP is also bigger. I use to own both guns. Price is is also a big difference. With all that said, I highly suggest you try and rent both guns and shoot them and buy whichever you shoot, like or feels best. That's really the only way to get a true answer. All you'll read here are opinions and usually it's opinions based one whichever they own. But since your asking, I think the USP was more accurate, both very reliable though I'll give that edge to the USP. The recoil almost similar despite the bore axis difference. I would personally choose a USP45 but the price difference just doesn't justify it.

[FNH5-7]

I went with the G21 SF with picatinny rail. Love it and don't regret it.

[s500]

If I wanted a very nice range gun, I'd pick the H&K.

If I was going to have to let it be abused, I'd take the Glock.

I'd think that the H&K is more accurate. If i wanted solid reliable accurate and good looking gun i will take my sig p220 combat!

[cc56]

I tried both before I bought the HK USP45. For me though I fell that the grip was made JUST FOR ME!!! It feels perfect, and nothing has ever felt better. I didn't even get close to that from the glock. ( Not bashing glock). I got a used HK and have never looked back. Like you said try both and look at your finances. HK is more expensive all around, price of the gun and extra magazines.

[hkdad]

if you are getting a .45 cal handgun that is made of melted barbie parts i would recommend the H&K USP. very reliable and has good ergonomics. but if you are planning to get a 9mm or .40cal to shoot matches like IDPA OR USPSA i suggest you get a glock.

[ocspeedracer]

I've heard a lot of people are thrown by the recoil of the HK because the rifling is going the opposite direction.

[hkdad]

I've heard a lot of people are thrown by the recoil of the HK because the rifling is going the opposite direction.

first time i heard

[ocspeedracer]

Could be fud, didn't claim it as my own. I know glock, not HK.

[ap3572001]

I sold my G21 and my G30....
I have a full size USP 45 that I carry in Ted Blocker holster off duty.
It is as accurate or more accurate than most stock 1911's and works everytime.

[drunktank]

I've owned both brands and prefer the HK for several reasons. I've had many different GLOCKS jam on me using various loads. Never with a USP. I prefer the triggers on HK's, especially the light LEM. The USP feels smoother to me, regardless of bore axis. The grip feels better to me as well, but if I skip on a hogue grip, they feel about even. I like how the G21 has the ability to use barrel/caliber conversions though.

[1911Operator]

today im getting a G30sf! next on the list is a the G21SF, and if you get a Kriss V, you can share mags!

[Peaceful John]

I've heard a lot of people are thrown by the recoil of the HK because the rifling is going the opposite direction.

Can't you just shoot with your left hand?

[626Tony]

GET BOTH !

[zarosfaltor]

GET BOTH !

Haha, maybe eventually, but one at a time. I already have 2 Sigs, and as good of a gun as the 220 is, I'd like something a little different. I think I'm pretty set on the HK given further consideration, unless I decide to go crazy and get a 1911 instead.