Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

H&K USP Compact .40 S&W Muzzle Energy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Revolverhawk
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 33

    H&K USP Compact .40 S&W Muzzle Energy

    Hey, I recently bought a USP compact .40 S&W. I am still waiting for the 10 day waiting period to be up. This will be my first semi-auto handgun that I own, but I have fired the semi-auto's of friends before. Anyways, my question is this:

    You should only have one gun outside your main safe in a small, quickly accessible lockbox as your home defense gun. All the rest should be in your main safe. Does the compact have enough muzzle energy from the 3.58 inch barrel to consistently get decent penetration/hydrostatic shock from Corbon DPX hollowpoint self defense loads? I have heard of people being shot multiple times with some cartridges/barrels- such as a .38 special (weak)from a long barrel or a powerful cartridge from a short barrel (.357 magnum, 2 inch barrel) and it not having enough stopping power to consistently inflict hydrostatic shock.



    Does the compact have enough stopping power with .40 S&W hollowpoint defense rounds to consistently stop an attacker? I plan on enjoying the gun at the range either way, but I want to know if I should have something else as my home defense gun in an easily accessible lockbox, like a 4 inch GP 100 .357.

    The problem is, the only reliable magnum revolver that can accept a flashlight mount to my knowledge is the 327 TRR8(with the internal safety lock removed of course,) but it is sold out everywhere I go, and the way the lights are set up in my house if a criminal broke into my house at night I might not be able to get confirmation to see whether it is a criminal or a roomate coming into the house late at night without a flashlight.

    Hence, I want a home defense gun that mounts a flashlight, but at the same time I realized only after paying for the S&W USP compact that I didn't know how much the polygonal barrel affected muzzle velocity, energy, and penetration, and if it was enough to consistently stun an attacker with Hydrostatic shock.

    Thoughts?
    Last edited by Revolverhawk; 12-16-2010, 9:24 PM.
  • #2
    Dirmer3
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 67

    Just use the USP .40 for your home self-defense weapon. Not many attackers are going to keep attacking after a couple well placed shots... Sure, it won't leave a hole in their back wide enough to stick your head through, but it'll take them down...

    Comment

    • #3
      SixtyDashOne
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 262

      Don't worry about hydrostatic shock. I think sometimes people get too wrapped up in things like that and tend to overthink things. The USPc .40 is a fine combat pistol, I have owned one for a few years myself. Get your gun, train with it, and don't worry about 1-shot stops. Your primary concern should be getting to know your weapon and acquiring a good sight picture and placing shots on center mass... not hydrostatic shock, muzzle velocity, etc.
      Originally posted by tuna quesadilla
      Sure, a good 1911 will feed FMJ ammo flawlessly, and some of them will even feed JHP. But they lack the features that make the Glock the excellent pistol that it is. A 1911 is an enthusiast's toy, not a serious combat pistol.

      Comment

      • #4
        Sturnovik
        Veteran Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 2937

        The usp is a very accurate handgun, even the compact model with that shorter barrel. I wouldn't worry about it.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1