Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Pervasive .357 magnum "wisdom" I keep seeing tossed around.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #46
    precisionshooter308
    Junior Member
    • May 2009
    • 63

    So if practicing with .38's is useless then dry firing must be a complete waste of time. All those hundreds of hours dry firing wasted oh woe is me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    sigpic Noblesse Oblige

    Comment

    • #47
      RTE
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 1948

      From a SHTF perspective.
      If you find yourself with no gun and no ammo.
      You have a choice between picking up a 38 or 357 pistol from the table.....your choice is going to be the 357.

      Comment

      • #48
        bandook
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2010
        • 1220

        Originally posted by RTE
        From a SHTF perspective.
        If you find yourself with no gun and no ammo.
        You have a choice between picking up a 38 or 357 pistol from the table.....your choice is going to be the 357.
        ...but what ammo are you going to pick up....
        .38 for me. I can shoot it all day.

        Comment

        • #49
          CoolCalGunner
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 63

          Originally posted by lazs
          Oh.. I have a 22 conversion for my EAA witness 45 acp but it is not to "train" with the witness instead of 45 acp.. I have lots of 45 acp ammo..

          I have the conversion so that I can have a great 22 semi auto for cheap.
          You have the same exact setup like mine

          I always practice with my .22lr conversion kit, and to complete the session I swap the .45acp slide & barrel and send 10rds of .45acp down the range

          Comment

          • #50
            RTE
            Senior Member
            • May 2009
            • 1948

            Originally Posted by RTE
            From a SHTF perspective.
            If you find yourself with no gun and no ammo.
            You have a choice between picking up a 38 or 357 pistol from the table.....your choice is going to be the 357.
            Originally posted by bandook
            ...but what ammo are you going to pick up....
            .38 for me. I can shoot it all day.
            From a SHTF perspective.
            Any ammo one would come across traveling from point A to B
            (38, 38+P, 38+P+, 357 etc)
            Point being you can get by with more if you own a 357 over a 38.

            Comment

            • #51
              lazs
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2010
              • 538

              I own a 340 pd and it is the best gun there is for a 12 ounce gun. It is reliable and powerful and you can even fire it from your pocket if you don't mind catching on fire after.

              I trust it one hell of a lot more than a 9mm the same size and weight.

              As for shooting 38 spl being "useless" I don't think so.. I have a couple of 38spl guns and they are great fun to shoot and very accurate. I believe that a dedicated 38 spl gun most all of time will outshoot a .357 gun that is shooting the same 38spl rounds.

              and for the guy who thinks the stopping power of the .357 is myth.. there are still shootings happening with the .357 and it is still number one. while other calibers have advanced.. so has the .357. The others will always be playing catchup because there are limitations on semi autos that do not exist for .357 revolvers.

              Comment

              • #52
                Sailormilan2
                Veteran Member
                • Nov 2006
                • 3452

                The earlier Model 19s were not designed for continuous Magnum shooting(I'm not too sure the later ones stand up any better). They were designed in the era of "practise with 38 sp, carry 357 Mag". When Police departments started the policy of practising what you carried, many of the lighter framed 357 Magnum revolvers started shooting loose. There were also reports of forcing cone cracking with the newer 38 Sp +P+ Police ammo that was being issued.
                That is why the L framed S&Ws came into being.

                Comment

                • #53
                  23 Blast
                  Veteran Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 3754

                  How about this?

                  Practice with .357s, then carry .38?

                  That way, when you confront an attacker and you plant several .38 slugs in his knees and lower legs because of flinching, it will look better in court and you won't have to explain to an ignorant jury why you were using the ".357 Magnum" (which most non-gunners and antis understand as "death ray."

                  seriously though - I can see the value of training both ways. Always using the same load, same ammo, same gun, builds a familiarity such that a proficient shooter knows exactly where the bullet is going the second the hammer falls. However, with budgetary constraints, it does sometimes make sense to train on something that will build muscle memory and trigger and breath control while not costing as much as full-on premium defensive ammunition. To that end, I am a fan of .22 conversion kits. I have one for my 1911's, and they're a blast to shoot. I thought about getting a S&W 617 as a companion to my S&W 66, but dang - the .22 revolver costs more than the .357!!
                  "Two dead?!? HOW?!?"
                  [sigh] "Bullets, mortar fire, heavy artillery salvos, terminal syphilis, bad luck --- the usual things, Captain."

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    elSquid
                    In Memoriam
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 11844

                    Originally posted by lazs
                    and for the guy who thinks the stopping power of the .357 is myth.. there are still shootings happening with the .357 and it is still number one. while other calibers have advanced.. so has the .357. The others will always be playing catchup because there are limitations on semi autos that do not exist for .357 revolvers.


                    -- Michael

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      Fishslayer
                      In Memoriam
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 13035

                      Originally posted by elSquid
                      According to the published CHP test data from 1989-90, the .357 Magnum load used immediately prior to the CHP transition to .40 S&W was the Remington 125 gr JHP with an ave. MV of 1450 f/s from their duty revolvers. [/I]

                      -- Michael
                      That's gonna leave a mark. I don't care who ya are...
                      "He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog.
                      You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart.
                      You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion."


                      Originally Posted by JackRydden224
                      I hope Ruger pays the extortion fees for the SR1911. I mean the gun is just as good if not better than a Les Baer.
                      Originally posted by redcliff
                      A Colt collector shooting Rugers is like Hugh Grant cheating on Elizabeth Hurley with a hooker.

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        1911su16b870
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                        CGN Contributor
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 7654

                        357 loads in the J frame airweights (340PD, 360PD etc.) is painfull to shoot for more than 5 to 10 rounds, those guns were made to be carried alot and shot a little. Now shooting 38 in the same airweights is not a big deal.

                        357 loads in the large steel (heavier) K frames is fun to shoot!

                        I also handload 357 cases with 5-grains 231 and 125-grain copper coated truncated cone bullets for practice sessions to prevent that 38 carbon ring in the 357 cylinder.
                        "Bruen, the Bruen opinion, I believe, discarded the intermediate scrutiny test that I also thought was not very useful; and has, instead, replaced it with a text history and tradition test." Judge Benitez 12-12-2022

                        NRA Endowment Life Member, CRPA Life Member
                        GLOCK (Gen 1-5, G42/43), Colt AR15/M16/M4, Sig P320, Sig P365, Beretta 90 series, Remington 870, HK UMP Factory Armorer
                        Remington Nylon, 1911, HK, Ruger, Hudson H9 Armorer, just for fun!
                        I instruct it if you shoot it.

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          Grumpyoldretiredcop
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 6437

                          Who honestly wants to practice with .38 special? I do. My favorite .357 is a Model 19. A steady diet of full-house Magnum ammo would stretch the frame and ruin an irreplaceable pistol (I snagged it when my former agency switched from revolvers to Glocks). I do it often enough to be sure of where it hits, but that's it.

                          As to the second piece of "wisdom"... I think not.
                          I'm retired. That's right, retired. I don't want to hear about the cop who stopped you today or how you didn't think you should get a ticket. That just makes me grumpy!

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            Notblake
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2009
                            • 512

                            Does anyone have a dB comparison between 4" and 6" .357's shooting the same load?

                            Oh and also, I'll take the hearing loss over the being dead.

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              JTROKS
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 13093

                              Originally posted by Notblake
                              Does anyone have a dB comparison between 4" and 6" .357's shooting the same load?

                              Oh and also, I'll take the hearing loss over the being dead.
                              I was told there really is no big difference between a 6", a 4", and even a snubby, due to the cylinder gap. I'm sorry to inform that my S&W 66 w/ a 2.5" barrel sure sounds way louder than my 6" 686+ firing the same loads.
                              The wise man said just find your place
                              In the eye of the storm
                              Seek the roses along the way
                              Just beware of the thorns...
                              K. Meine

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                scarville
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 2325

                                Originally posted by JTROKS
                                I was told there really is no big difference between a 6", a 4", and even a snubby, due to the cylinder gap. I'm sorry to inform that my S&W 66 w/ a 2.5" barrel sure sounds way louder than my 6" 686+ firing the same loads.
                                It probably is. Somewhere I have a paper written around 1995 or 1998 (?) by a couple of engineers who measured the sound pressure level at various points arounds a semi-circle from directly in front of the muzzle to directly behind it. IIRC (it's been a while since I read it) they found 95% or more of sound pressure behind the gun was predicted by the muzzle blast. Cylinder gap in a revolver caused a small "blip" for detectors close the the 90 degree mark but made no significant difference to what the shooter experienced.

                                The guns were fired in an open field with no echo sources nearby.
                                Politicians and criminals are moral twins separated only by legal fiction.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1