HK USP Full Size 45

[ap3572001]

Objective look ( W/O Price considerations) at HK USP FULL SIZE 45. For LEO Duty gun.
VS. A G21?

VS. M&P 45?

ETC.

Thank You

[OneSevenDeuce]

Uh...

[plan-b]

Objectively. The USP looks the most professional & business-like. The M&P looks the most organic & elegant. The Glock looks... uh I'll stop there.

[resident-shooter]

Glawck is fugly

[drunktank]

Apparently you guys don't know what objective vs. subjective means...

[drunktank]

On that note, the USP has an external safety (V.1), if that is what you want. The M&P's have removable backstraps to help tailor your hand. The glock has the most capacity. All three are very reliable.

[plan-b]

Well... objective and looks don't really go together. So I was admitedly stretching for a response.

[Muttley]

Cocked and Locked... USP .45

[joelogic]

Do departments let you buy any gun? Arent there SOPs on carry conditions? Training requirements? Glock is easy to learn. Isnt it because the sheepole were scared of the cocked and locked look, ie 1911, departments went to the glock.

[jyo]

Well, I have owned an HK USP .45 full-size pistol for a couple of years now and can say it is truly reliable, shoots like a target pistol and has a very comfortable grip (for me). I have only shot the M&P in 9mm and it also seems like a fine gun as well---this would be a case of which feels better to you! Good luck.