Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Beretta M-9 vs. 92FS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Big John
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2007
    • 60

    Beretta M-9 vs. 92FS

    Hello every one, I just bought an M-9 and was wondering what the exact differences are between the M-9 and the 92FS. From what I understand, the finish is different and they are made at different factories with different tollerances and different metals/alloys, is this true?
    Special Operations
    Blackwater Alumni
    PSD, OGA & FID Advisor
    Owner/Founder/Gunsmith
    Proven Gear Surplus & Gunsmithing, Murrieta CA
  • #2
    aca72
    Veteran Member
    • Jan 2006
    • 3255

    From what pieces of information I gathered, there is no difference between the two in terms of build material, process, finish, fit, function and performance.

    The beauty of the M9 is that it does not have the "WARNING" on the slide.
    Long live CALGUNS!

    Selling: ✮ GLOCK ✮ Beretta ✮ SIG Sauer ✮ Stuff ✮

    Comment

    • #3
      Big John
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2007
      • 60

      So theres no difference between the Mil-Spec version and the SAAMI spec version? There has to be something, or else they wouldnt make two different versions of it (right?).
      Special Operations
      Blackwater Alumni
      PSD, OGA & FID Advisor
      Owner/Founder/Gunsmith
      Proven Gear Surplus & Gunsmithing, Murrieta CA

      Comment

      • #4
        S.F. 1357
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2005
        • 65

        The differences between the M9 and 92FS:

        -The M9 usually has a straight dustcover and non-radiused backstrap
        -The 92FS (recent model) has a radiused backstrap and angled dustcover
        -M9 markings (including proof markings and cage # markings)
        -M9 lacks the warning to read owner's manual
        -The rear sight of the 92FS has 2 dots, whereas the M9 has a single half-moon
        -M9 (unless special or limited edition) comes in cardboard box, with no plastic hard case

        Comment

        • #5
          SnWnMe
          Calguns Addict
          • Feb 2007
          • 6897

          The dustcover and the sight dots are different.
          Frank Da Tank

          Comment

          • #6
            Big John
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2007
            • 60

            Originally posted by S.F. 1357
            The differences between the M9 and 92FS:

            -The M9 usually has a straight dustcover and non-radiused backstrap
            -The 92FS (recent model) has a radiused backstrap and angled dustcover
            -M9 markings (including proof markings and cage # markings)
            -M9 lacks the warning to read owner's manual
            -The rear sight of the 92FS has 2 dots, whereas the M9 has a single half-moon
            -M9 (unless special or limited edition) comes in cardboard box, with no plastic hard case
            Thanks for the info.
            Special Operations
            Blackwater Alumni
            PSD, OGA & FID Advisor
            Owner/Founder/Gunsmith
            Proven Gear Surplus & Gunsmithing, Murrieta CA

            Comment

            • #7
              david_place_834

              Congratualtions on the M9. What SF1357 is all true. I have smaller medium hands so the small cutout in the backstrap on recent 92fs's would be more appropriate for me. However, should I intend to get a Beretta (and I probably shall) it would be an M9.

              Also checkout berettaforum.net.

              BTW, everyone seems to have changed the mainstring "D" to lessen (maybe smoothen) the trigger pull.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1