Sig vs Glock question

[BigAL]

I do not plan on purchasing many other handguns, maybe another one just to have in case something fails with my primary, but other than that eh.

"Beware the man with one gun - he likely knows how to use it."

[SkiDevil]

The reason I choose 9mm and these two manufacturers as was stated, I shot other guns at the ranges and friends' but then in the end it came down to these two.

I understand 100% what you are saying SkiDevil about basic fundamentals, I took martial arts for 9 years when I was younger but as the other poster said I want to practice with what I might potentially have to use one day.

I actually do not have a preference to the actions, I liked how single felt and double as well...I am overall not that picky of a person. I mentioned the SigPro because I found that the trigger on it was easier for me than on the Sig P228 which was the other Sig I was leaning towards.

When I shot the Glocks, the G19 jammed once, lol. But the G26 did not, neither did the G17. None of the Sigs jammed which stuck out in my mind. I do not really care how either gun looks...it is a tool, I don't really care how my tools look but I do care how they fit my hands and the Sig fits better, I think the SigPro I used had the out of box grips though.

I do not plan on purchasing many other handguns, maybe another one just to have in case something fails with my primary, but other than that eh. I have never seen the need for owning multiple types of the same tool, I only have two shotguns. One for sporting and one for defense. Only one rifle, that Colt Walther made in .22LR to get me proficient before upgrading to an actual .223 rifle. I thought you would like that last bit SkiDevil!

I am very glad to hear that you are giving the matter at hand some serious consideration and thought.

If you really like the SIG, by all means that is what you should get. As for the various models the 226 and 229 are the cream of the crop. And either in the 9mm chambering will last a lifetime with care.

As for the 228 and the Sig Pro, I would steer clear of both for the simple reason that the stamped steel slide is not as durable as the complete all stainless slide. Although, it is somewhat apples to oranges comparison I manged to heavily wear a Sig 220 .45 ACP pistol with the stamped slide in about five years with somewhere under 30K of mostly high pressure ammo.

The Sig Pro is a decent enough pistol but for a polymer frame the Glock is a more proven commodity.

I've been carrying and shooting a Sig 226 stainless steel 9mm for several years and have easily fired over 10K of rounds through it with no problems, whatsoever. As a matter of fact I cannot recall the last time the pistol malfunctioned, period. Sigs are very reliable firearms.

The one caveat I will impart is for you to peruse the Sig Forum website and make the determination for yourself which particular model is best for your needs. I myself with the rampant speculation of the substandard parts and lower quality controls would look for a used (in excellent condition) P229 or P226 to avoid any problems with purchasing a lemon or substandard weapon.

Date of manufacture is available through SIG with the serial number. Used pistols in 9mm are for sale frequently on this forum and others. In these times you may even come across a really good deal from someone looking to sell one-off quickly.

However, if that is not practical, then buy your pistol from a well known and reputable dealer, who will assist you if there are any problems with the gun. And try to fire at least 500-1000 rounds in order to determine if the gun is reliable.

Good Luck,
SkiDevil

P.S.
With any of the Classic Sigs (229,226, or 220), you can obtain the rimfire conversion Kit for under $300.00 and fire rimfire rounds for additional practice. I have one for my 226 and it works fairly well with CCI rimfire ammo.

Also, don't discount the Glocks because of the one malfunction experience. They are incredibly reliable and durable weapons. I have a G17 with somewhere close to 100K rounds through it and it is every bit as reliable as the day I bought it. The difference versus the Sig is that the Glock is more prone to limp wristing malfunctions. You can shoot your Sig upside down and it will still fire. But in the end, that crisp single action trigger whens the day for me too. Oh yes, I agree with you on your assessment of buying quality gear.

The quality over quantity lesson is best learned early in life.

[slik556]

"normancay" If it were me I would look at this. He is now almost giving it away.. http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=241731
I don't know if you are in the area he is but it has come down from $675.00 to the price listed in the thread now... take a look and see..

[BlackonBlack]

For a first gun I'd go with the Glock 19. Very simply to use, simply to shoot, easy to service.. I personally wouldn't get a Glock 26 as a first pistol for none other reason is that it's generally referred to be an exclusively carried gun which is probably not what you'd want right out of the gate.