Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

I want a striker fired 1911

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cineski
    Calguns Addict
    • Nov 2007
    • 6205

    I want a striker fired 1911

    I dare say it: I want a striker fired 1911 . I know all you 1911 fanatics just skipped a few heart beats and believe John Moses Browning just turned in his grave, but to me, this would be an awesome gun. Personally, I love 1911's. I just don't like the platform of 1911's with the external safety and SAO hair trigger. I don't want to like it. Yes, I could train and train and train but I don't want to fire every gun like a 1911, therefore I chose to not partake in the 1911 nectar. And yes there's the POV that the original was perfection and should never be changed, but if JMB were alive today, do you think he'd still be stuck on this design? He was an innovative mind, which in most examples I speculate means "not stuck in old ways." Para Ordnance has the LDA. But it's still hammer fired and I have no idea how much that platform caught on.

    So is something like this possible? I know it would change the overall dimensions at the rear of the gun, but I wouldn't think it would be drastic. The slide would probably have to be a bit longer toward the rear to hold the striker fired innards with a redesigned beavertail or lack thereof. Just think: An all steel 1911 with a highly tuned XD trigger, or a tuned Glock trigger, or a Kahr trigger, whatever your poison. All similar in function and feel. It would open the doors to Hotel 1911 to many many people, though. I know this isn't something that will realistically happen, but as the old saying goes "things do happen." Who knows, maybe a few cad designs later and a few phone calls to a machinist and a prototype may just happen? Maybe
  • #2
    JTROKS
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Nov 2007
    • 13093

    Better get the defibrillator!
    The wise man said just find your place
    In the eye of the storm
    Seek the roses along the way
    Just beware of the thorns...
    K. Meine

    Comment

    • #3
      jdberger
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • Oct 2005
      • 8944

      Here...try this...just as good...




      ...friggin apostate.....
      Rest in Peace - Andrew Breitbart. A true student of Alinsky.

      90% of winning is simply showing up.

      "Let's not lose sight of how much we reduced our carbon footprint by telecommuting this protest." 383green

      sigpic
      NRA Benefactor Member

      Comment

      • #4
        redcliff
        Calguns Addict
        • Feb 2008
        • 5676

        It sounds like you don't want a 1911; you want a GLock with a 1911 grip.

        The quintessential feature of the 1911 is "cocked and locked" condition 1.
        "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
        "What we get away with isn't usually the same as what's good for us"
        "An extended slide stop is the second most useless part you can put on a 1911"

        "While Ruger DA revolvers may be built like a tank, they have the aesthetics of one also,
        although I suppose there are a few tanks which I owe an apology to for that remark"

        Comment

        • #5
          Black Majik
          Calguns Addict
          • Oct 2005
          • 9695

          Any reason you're opposed to an exposed hammer? The LDA is probably your closest bet, a external hammer still provides second strike capability.

          Or, you could always pin the grip safety and leave the manual safety on fire, though I don't recommend it, it'll have the short slack and reset like a Glock.

          Comment

          • #6
            Spdjunkie
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2006
            • 1974

            IMHO for a Striker w/ Safety:

            Smith & Wesson M&P45 w/ Thumb Safety


            Springfield Armory XD .45ACP w/ Grip Safety


            For plastic/polymer/stirker. I shoot Glocks, but "To each his own"

            ALSO, IMHO: Nothing beats the neutral feel & shooting comfort of a Gov't/FS 1911. Many try to imitate/duplicate, but nothing comes close = .45ACP Perfection
            Last edited by Spdjunkie; 09-16-2009, 10:15 AM.

            Comment

            • #7
              Beelzy
              Calguns Addict
              • Apr 2008
              • 9224

              Wait what is that noise??

              Oh, its JMB kicking his casket!
              "I kill things for a living, don't make yourself one of them"

              Comment

              • #8
                fourXfour
                Member
                • May 2006
                • 391

                I would definitely buy a
                glock/kahr that takes 1911mags.

                Comment

                • #9
                  M47_Dragon
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 1263

                  That kid on YouTube who builds paper guns might be able to make something like this.

                  Originally posted by bigbob76
                  I'm in the process of de-humping all my Glocks.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    M. D. Van Norman
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 4168

                    A striker-fired 1911 wouldn’t be a 1911 (or even a Colt-Browning pistol).

                    If you were to use a safe-action system, you would lose the short trigger pull beloved on the 1911 series. If you still want a single-action trigger, you would also have to keep the manual safety. You would have to compromise somewhere.

                    There are already compromises available. The SIG-Sauer and Kahr systems are good examples.

                    The other route would be to compromise on the way you use a 1911-style pistol.
                    Matthew D. Van Norman
                    Dancing Giant Sales | Licensed Firearms Dealer | Rainier, WA

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      cineski
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 6205

                      I don't think some of you really read what I wrote. I want a steel 1911 with a striker fired trigger. I don't want a Glock. Why? Because I hate Glocks. I've tried many times to like them, just can't. I love my XD's. It's sort of akin to a polymer 1911. However, it's still a polymer XD (or M&P or fill in the polymer blank) and not what I'm talking about:

                      An all steel striker fired 1911.

                      And to those that argue the quintessential feature of a 1911 is only in it's trigger, I disagree. 1911's just shoot amazing, point naturally, are just plane cool. They can shoot just as amazing with out the IMO crappy cocked and locked trigger system.

                      Oh, the LDA does seem okay and a step in the direction of what I'm talking about. I just think a striker fired trigger is better than this after personal experience with different platforms. Okay, to get more specific: Steel 1911, retain grip safety without locking the slide, tuned XD style trigger that's still short and crisp with a trigger safety. Okay, an all steel XD would do the trick, but it's still not avail and it's still not a 1911.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        cineski
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Nov 2007
                        • 6205

                        The XD is a SAO pistol with no thumb safety and it works great.

                        Originally posted by M. D. Van Norman
                        A striker-fired 1911 wouldn’t be a 1911 (or even a Colt-Browning pistol).

                        If you were to use a safe-action system, you would lose the short trigger pull beloved on the 1911 series. If you still want a single-action trigger, you would also have to keep the manual safety. You would have to compromise somewhere.

                        There are already compromises available. The SIG-Sauer and Kahr systems are good examples.

                        The other route would be to compromise on the way you use a 1911-style pistol.
                        Last edited by cineski; 09-16-2009, 11:09 AM.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          redcliff
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 5676

                          Originally posted by cineski
                          And to those that argue the quintessential feature of a 1911 is only in it's trigger, I disagree. 1911's just shoot amazing, point naturally, are just plane cool. They can shoot just as amazing with out the IMO crappy cocked and locked trigger system.
                          One of the reasons 1911's shoot amazing is because they're not "half cocked/striker fired". Theres nothing crappy about cocked and locked, it just takes more training to be proficient with it.
                          "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
                          "What we get away with isn't usually the same as what's good for us"
                          "An extended slide stop is the second most useless part you can put on a 1911"

                          "While Ruger DA revolvers may be built like a tank, they have the aesthetics of one also,
                          although I suppose there are a few tanks which I owe an apology to for that remark"

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            cineski
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Nov 2007
                            • 6205

                            I am just as accurate with an XD as a 1911. Personally. There is much more to a 1911 than just the trigger......which I personally find crappy ;-) I don't like having a thumb safety with any firearm. Again, you shouldn't HAVE to train so much to use a 1911. Yes, with its current setup you do if you want to use it as a defensive handgun. But my argument is you shouldn't have to. Different platforms allow people to have choices and saying a 1911 is only this way or the highway is leaving a lot of people out of the 1911 game.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              M. D. Van Norman
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 4168

                              Is the XD a safe-action (partially cocked) or single-action (fully cocked) system? I thought it was the former, but I am not familiar with these pistols.

                              To my knowledge, there are no single-action semi-automatic pistols without manual safeties, or at least they are rare. Please educate me if this is incorrect.
                              Matthew D. Van Norman
                              Dancing Giant Sales | Licensed Firearms Dealer | Rainier, WA

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1