Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Turners spreading more FUD?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neomentat
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2006
    • 1400

    Turners spreading more FUD?

    So I was at Turners today and the guy there was telling me that in California, if you don't lock your guns with a CA legal lock, and it subsequently gets stolen and is used in a crime, then you're guilty of a felony.

    I have never heard of such a thing, is this more FUD being spread by Turners? Or is there some truth to this?


    this same employee also said "H&K uses Kevlar in their polymer pistol frame which is way stronger than Glock's polymer frame".


    The last time I checked Kevlar is a type of weave, how the hell can molded polymer be even considered Kevlar? Turners have some idiots for employees.
    Last edited by neomentat; 08-18-2009, 9:44 PM.
    "I will not fear, fear is the mind killer... I will face my fear and let it pass through me, only I will remain." Bene Gesserit training
  • #2
    OCya
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 843

    Well those locks aren't even stronger than bike locks. The key looks like the kind that is used for luggage.

    I say big BS.

    Comment

    • #3
      paul0660
      In Memoriam
      • Jul 2007
      • 15669

      It is fud. After a crime no one knows if it was locked up or not, and you can't really believe the criminal. However, you could become a defendant in a civil case, and juries are wacky. If you have a gun and don't have a safe, I think you are making a mistake.
      *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

      Comment

      • #4
        Rekrab
        Valar Dohaeris
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • May 2009
        • 5534

        It IS a felony if you have an unlocked gun with children in the house though right?

        Maybe it's some weird extrapolation of that?
        Beretta PX4 Storm .40 S&W (Round Count 3,050) | Yugo M72 | Romy M44

        Big Ammo Sale!
        Harris Bipod and Bushnell Elite 3200 Scope for Sale

        Comment

        • #5
          paul0660
          In Memoriam
          • Jul 2007
          • 15669

          I don't have time to look it up, but if you have a gun + ammo and a kid gets it and someone get hurts yes you are in trouble.

          Easy to prevent.........and NOT by telling the kid not to, btw.
          *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

          Comment

          • #6
            rrr70
            Senior Member
            • Jul 2008
            • 1832

            Originally posted by paul0660
            I don't have time to look it up, but if you have a gun + ammo and a kid gets it and someone get hurts yes you are in trouble.
            Unless you are a cop.
            "The police cannot protect the citizen at this stage of our development, and they cannot even protect themselves in many cases. It is up to the private citizen to protect himself and his family, and this is not only acceptable, but mandatory" Jeff Cooper

            sigpic

            Comment

            • #7
              Blacklist231
              Member
              • Sep 2008
              • 162

              you may be guilty of a felony if a child gains access to that firearm and thereby causes death or injury to any person unless the firearm was in a secure locked container or locked with a locking device that rendered it inoperable.

              (PC Section 12035-12036)
              ...

              Comment

              • #8
                neomentat
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2006
                • 1400

                Originally posted by Blacklist231
                ...
                yes I know the locked gun requirement with kids in the house. however, the turners guy specifically said "if your gun is not locked, stolen and then used in a crime" then you're guilty of a felony
                "I will not fear, fear is the mind killer... I will face my fear and let it pass through me, only I will remain." Bene Gesserit training

                Comment

                • #9
                  HUTCH 7.62
                  In Memoriam
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 11298

                  Another reason why we call this place Kommiefornia. Personally I'm gonna rape this state for all its money and move to a free state.
                  Some say that he once mooned two prostitutes just for a round of drinks, but wasn't surprised by the reply......They call him, the Hutch
                  Some say that he rode a dirtbike 7k miles across the country and that he once applied Bengay to his own testicles for a mere $50............They call him, the Hutch -Top Gear

                  http://media.liveauctiongroup.net/i/...CCAB7CE8D70F60

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    dfletcher
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 14787

                    As I understand it, the Children’s Firearm Accident Prevention Act of 1991 states that a person who keeps a loaded firearm where a child obtains and improperly uses it has violated CA law. I think it's interesting that the violation occurs not when you stuff that locked & cocked 1911 under the mattress, but rather when the kid picks it up and acidentally shoots the next door neighbor's cat. But as the law is written, it seems to me that if the same kid picks up the same gun under the same circumstances and correctly shoots a bad guy come to hurt him, no violation has occured.

                    Not saying that's the thing to do, but I do find the wording interesting - must be a specific reason for it I suppose.
                    GOA Member & SAF Life Member

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Army
                      Veteran Member
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 3915

                      No, the guy is full of FUD. There is NO legal requirement to keep firearms locked or inoperable 24/7.
                      "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself...A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."......Cicero

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        strangerdude
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 1762

                        Originally posted by neomentat
                        So I was at Turners today and the guy there was telling me that in California, if you don't lock your guns with a CA legal lock, and it subsequently gets stolen and is used in a crime, then you're guilty of a felony.

                        I have never heard of such a thing, is this more FUD being spread by Turners? Or is there some truth to this?
                        Tell me, when don't they spread fud? Turner's Is full of idiots.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          RaceDay
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 1013

                          Originally posted by rrr70
                          Unless you are a cop.
                          Yeah, then instead of going to jail, you get to file a lawsuit.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            trendar5
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 1014

                            Originally posted by RaceDay
                            Yeah, then instead of going to jail, you get to file a lawsuit.
                            Can you two guys elaborate? Was there an incident in Southern California that I didn't hear about that makes you post this? Just curious....

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              rrr70
                              Senior Member
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 1832

                              Originally posted by trendar5
                              Can you two guys elaborate? Was there an incident in Southern California that I didn't hear about that makes you post this? Just curious....

                              "The police cannot protect the citizen at this stage of our development, and they cannot even protect themselves in many cases. It is up to the private citizen to protect himself and his family, and this is not only acceptable, but mandatory" Jeff Cooper

                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1