Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

GP100 VS 686

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hylander
    Veteran Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 3965

    GP100 VS 686

    So looking at purchasing one of these.
    6", 6 shot, SS
    Leaning towards the GP since I'm a ruger fan.
    However the 686 is a beautiful revolver and seems to handle well.
    Will be used mostly with medium cast loads but maybe heavy loads for hunting as well
    Recommendations ?
    Failure is not an Option
  • #2
    tigerpan
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2012
    • 2195

    For hot load ruger will work better. I would get both, but gp100 champion first m.

    Comment

    • #3
      Capybara
      CGSSA Coordinator
      CGN Contributor
      • Feb 2012
      • 15230

      In general, both are GREAT revolvers. Kind of a tie in my mind. The Ruger is generally regarded as a more rugged build specifically for hot loads. I have three S&W Revolvers and they are all mechanical works of art. I have almost bought a few Ruger revolvers too but have not yet, although I do own a few Ruger semi-autos.

      Your best best is to go to your local gun store that will have both and pick them up and compare them side by side. I don't think one is superior to the other and I would be happy with either, unless I wanted to shoot really hot loads, like perhaps for hogs or mountain lion/bear duties? Then I would get the Ruger personally. IMHO, there is no reason for really hot handgun loads other than hunting. I sure as heck don't want to shoot 200 rounds of them in a practice/target session.
      NRA Certified Metallic Cartridge Reloading Instructor, Shotgun Instructor and Range Safety Officer

      sigpic

      Comment

      • #4
        geedavell
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 1820

        Chevy vs Ford

        Comment

        • #5
          Rcjackrabbit
          Senior Member
          • May 2012
          • 971

          Comment

          • #6
            hylander
            Veteran Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 3965

            So I'm thinking Ruger gets your vote
            Failure is not an Option

            Comment

            • #7
              hylander
              Veteran Member
              • Oct 2005
              • 3965

              [QUOTE=mj1;27127629]What is your goal so we can give the input you are looking for ?
              That would go a long way to getting an answer.
              What caliber and finish

              All stated in the OP.
              Failure is not an Option

              Comment

              • #8
                ARDude
                Veteran Member
                • May 2006
                • 2723

                It's totally your choice to choose. But, Smith revolvers have a better trigger out of the box. If you don't like the locking mechinism on them, it can be disabled/removed and a plug put in place.

                Ruger is more beefy to handle a steady diet of hot loads. And trigger can be lightened.

                I do prefer the S&W revolvers, but I don't mind spending xtra for pre lock used models.
                Real-life Girls

                Comment

                • #9
                  ARDude
                  Veteran Member
                  • May 2006
                  • 2723

                  It's totally your choice to choose. But, Smith revolvers have a better trigger out of the box. If you don't like the locking mechinism on them, it can be disabled/removed and a plug put in place.

                  Ruger is more beefy to handle a steady diet of hot loads. And trigger can be lightened.

                  I do prefer the S&W revolvers, but I don't mind spending xtra for pre lock used models.
                  Real-life Girls

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Beelzy
                    Calguns Addict
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 9224

                    Who cares about the dumb Hillary hole? I've shot both models and they handle hot loads just fine. The Smith will also hold it's value better, even with the hole.
                    "I kill things for a living, don't make yourself one of them"

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      mj1
                      Veteran Member
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 3318

                      [QUOTE=hylander;27127849]
                      Originally posted by mj1
                      What is your goal so we can give the input you are looking for ?
                      That would go a long way to getting an answer.
                      What caliber and finish

                      All stated in the OP.
                      Again I say your limited description was not much to go on.

                      Good luck when the Grizzly jams the .357 up you hind end.

                      Sorry I wasted your time.
                      WTS As new M47 Madsen 3006 w/bayonet.
                      WTS NIB Mosin 91/59
                      I will deliver or ship, details to be arranged with buyer.
                      The Spartans do not ask how many the enemies are but where they are.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Grumpyoldretiredcop
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 6437

                        I've owned both. Sold the 686 and kept the GP100 (and just picked up another) solely on the basis of felt recoil with heavy loads. Since the GP100 has a post instead of a perimeter grip frame, adding a Hogue grip gives you lots of cushy rubber to take the sting out of full-house .357 loads.

                        Other than that, I'd say pretty equal. The GP100 is literally Ruger's answer to the L-frame.
                        I'm retired. That's right, retired. I don't want to hear about the cop who stopped you today or how you didn't think you should get a ticket. That just makes me grumpy!

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Mayor McRifle
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Dec 2013
                          • 7662

                          I own both. The GP100 wins the “feels like a tank” category. The 686 wins every other category that matters. The GP100 is not a bad revolver, but I would choose the 686 over it every time, without hesitation.
                          Anchors Aweigh

                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Pablo5959
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2013
                            • 1288

                            If you’re going to shoot cast then the S&W would be a better choice.
                            Ruger is notorious for having inconsistent cylinder machining. Much leading you will have.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              akjunkie
                              CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 3484

                              I got a GP100 6in SS. Got about 200rds thru it.
                              1st 100rds I broke it in with 38 special.
                              After that I switched over to Fiocchi 357 magnum.

                              40rds in my gun "jammed". Couldn't pull the hammer back or open the cylinder. Couple hrs later when my gun "cooled" off I was able to open the cylinder and empty out the live rounds and the hammer started working again.

                              Only happned once and I havent been able to duplicate the problem. My GP100 is now a dedicated range toy. I wouldn trust it for HD duties.

                              Go for the 686.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1