Which of the so called Slimline 9mm Glocks make most sense to You ? I tried them all ( 43,43X and 48) . To me G43 is most useful . Mainly as a back up or for deep concealment. Off duty , I never see a reason to carry anything smaller than a Glock 19.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slimline Glocks
Collapse
X
-
I don't like carrying anything smaller than a Glock 19. I do not have a license to carry permit because they are not available where I live. However having fired many different sizes of Glock, the one that is most comfortable in my hand is the 19. Therefore it would be the most natural for me to grip and shoot under duress.sigpic
PIMP stands for Positive Intellectual Motivated Person
When pimping begins, friendship ends.
Don't let your history be a mystery -
If comparing Glock 19 to the singlestack glocks, then yeah I kind of agree. It doesn't make sense (to me) to carry a singlestack glock with such a limited capacity when there are other 9mm guns comparable in size with greater mag capacities. Unless of course you're using the 15rd Shield Arms mags. Then my vote would go to Glock 48 which essentially becomes a thinner and lighter Glock 19.
Keep in mind I have no meaningful experience with these guns and probably never will so long as I remain in CA.
This was a cool video that touches on your topic though - comparing the 43, 43x and 48.
Last edited by Maulerrr; 12-31-2020, 4:12 PM.Comment
-
For some, even me, the Glock 19 is rather bulky. I mostly carry it for winter carry. My go-to is usually the 26.
I can see the 43X/48 being desirable if using the Shield mags. However, the P365 would be ideal in terms of capacity, size, and concealability than any of the current stock Glocks.Comment
-
I've got both, and then some, and agree with the OP.
Although I've got holsters for the G43, I seldom, maybe never, carry it alone. I could; I've just not found the right occasion, I suppose.
I originally bought my G43 to replace my S&W 642 revolver as my backup gun; carried either on my ankle or in a body-armor holster.
I mostly carry my G19Gen5, even though I've also got a G17Gen5 and a G26gen3. When I'm in a nostalgic mood, I'll carry an old .40, my G23gen3.
With all these Glocks already-owned, I never bought into (at least not yet) a G43X or G48.Last edited by L-2; 12-31-2020, 4:43 PM.(former) Glock and 1911 Armorer; LEO (now retired)Comment
-
Never got to fondle anything other than the G43, which I really liked - but I’m not sure the trade off in size between the G43x and the G26 is worth it? I mean, the G43x uses specific magazines, parts and so on - the G26 is capable of using the entire series of Glock 9mm magazines and almost all the parts are interchangeable with the G17/19/34Originally posted by ysr_racerPlease don't bring logic and reason into an interwebs discussion
Comment
-
I like my G43. For me it’s the perfect size to carry. I’ve carried the XDs and the G19 but always go back to the G43.Comment
-
I’m 5’9” 175lbs and for me, the Glock 43 tucks away much more easily than my 19 or 30s. I use +1 pads on the 43, carry a second magazine on me and have extras in the truck. Not overly concerned about the limited capacity.When the battle drum beats, it is too late to sharpen your sword."
Sir Winston ChurchillComment
-
None of them make sense to me. For a few people with smaller hands, and in a deep concealment role, they probably make sense. But from a general carry perspective, the width of the gun isn't what most people have a problem concealing. And the difference in width in particular compared to a regular sized Glock is very minimal IMO...and it's not a great enough benefit to me to justify the reduced capacity that goes along with them. YMMV."Kestryll I wanna lick your doughnut."
Fighter PilotComment
-
None of them make sense to me. For a few people with smaller hands, and in a deep concealment role, they probably make sense. But from a general carry perspective, the width of the gun isn't what most people have a problem concealing. And the difference in width in particular compared to a regular sized Glock is very minimal IMO...and it's not a great enough benefit to me to justify the reduced capacity that goes along with them. YMMV.Join Active Junky for online rebates....$10 to both you and me!
https://www.activejunky.com/invite/238017
Comment
-
I have all kinds of Glock for a very long time... Glock 48 is a different kind of Glock
it feels perfect in my hand for some reason. It feels like a m$p shield shield but shoots like a Glock 17.
Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,772
Posts: 25,162,518
Members: 357,365
Active Members: 5,130
Welcome to our newest member, Kahiau18.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 12276 users online. 94 members and 12182 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.

Comment