Gentlemen
After finishing the 3 days training in 'Basic Pistol Course' learning safety and basic marksmanship and passing the FSC with 100% rate (Firearm Safety Certificate, check: https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/fscpfaqs#1G), I'm looking forward to acquire a handgun.
The course was really amazing, it was taught by an elder gentleman (former military) and his lovely wife in a pretty diverse class (engineers, doctors, designers, house wives, etc) with people of varying age groups (the youngest was a lady on her early 20's and the older was a gentleman on his late 50's).
We had the opportunity to try small guns like a Ruger Mark III (.22), all the way to 9mm Beretta, 45 Springfield 1911A1 and the 44 Mag Ruger Blackhawk (that felt like a hand cannon, really...) and a few others in-between.
I was looking to buy new, in the budget range of 600-1200. Also wonder if would make more sense to get 2 guns (a 9mm and a higher caliber?) to get started.
I visited the firing range today with a friend, shot for a little over an hour (2 boxes of 9mm ammo, 1 box for the S&W .357).
The guns tested:
a) Sig 2022: + (light), - (precision).
b) HK USP9 V1 4.25" barrel: + (handling/built), - (couldn't shoot well with it, dunno why?).
c) XD 9401: + (handling, precision), - (build seems lacking compared to the Beretta and HK).
d) Beretta 92FS (9mm): + (precision, looks), - (felt a bit heavier).
e) S&W .357 (686): + (precision, handling), - (heavy).
I was able to shoot better with the Beretta and the S&W. The XD seems to me the better value so far.
The HK felt *great* at hand, but given the higher price + personal poor performance I guess it is not the right handgun for me.
I wonder if I should return next weekend to the firing range and shot a Glock for a little while before making a decision?
And you guys happen to known other handguns (legal in California) that I should try it out before buying?
After finishing the 3 days training in 'Basic Pistol Course' learning safety and basic marksmanship and passing the FSC with 100% rate (Firearm Safety Certificate, check: https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/fscpfaqs#1G), I'm looking forward to acquire a handgun.
The course was really amazing, it was taught by an elder gentleman (former military) and his lovely wife in a pretty diverse class (engineers, doctors, designers, house wives, etc) with people of varying age groups (the youngest was a lady on her early 20's and the older was a gentleman on his late 50's).
We had the opportunity to try small guns like a Ruger Mark III (.22), all the way to 9mm Beretta, 45 Springfield 1911A1 and the 44 Mag Ruger Blackhawk (that felt like a hand cannon, really...) and a few others in-between.
I was looking to buy new, in the budget range of 600-1200. Also wonder if would make more sense to get 2 guns (a 9mm and a higher caliber?) to get started.
I visited the firing range today with a friend, shot for a little over an hour (2 boxes of 9mm ammo, 1 box for the S&W .357).
The guns tested:
a) Sig 2022: + (light), - (precision).
b) HK USP9 V1 4.25" barrel: + (handling/built), - (couldn't shoot well with it, dunno why?).
c) XD 9401: + (handling, precision), - (build seems lacking compared to the Beretta and HK).
d) Beretta 92FS (9mm): + (precision, looks), - (felt a bit heavier).
e) S&W .357 (686): + (precision, handling), - (heavy).
I was able to shoot better with the Beretta and the S&W. The XD seems to me the better value so far.
The HK felt *great* at hand, but given the higher price + personal poor performance I guess it is not the right handgun for me.
I wonder if I should return next weekend to the firing range and shot a Glock for a little while before making a decision?
And you guys happen to known other handguns (legal in California) that I should try it out before buying?



Comment