Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Tolerances too tight for combat?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pantone354
    Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 117

    Tolerances too tight for combat?

    Hey Calgunners...I was watching this vid:



    ...and something he said caught my attention. He said you wouldn't take a $5,000 Kimber 1911 into combat because the tolerances are too tight. I gather that to mean that if junk gets gummed up in the action, it could fail? What does this mean for milspec?

    Thanks
  • #2
    rcslotcar
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 1100

    That is his opinion. What is yours??

    Comment

    • #3
      theLBC
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor
      CGN Contributor
      • Oct 2017
      • 6716

      tight tolerances can make certain ammo unreliable in feeding.
      this is why custom guns built for increased accuracy are typically used for competition only.

      why is the AK so reliable? it is loose and tolerant to small differences in ammo and dirt in the mechanisms.

      Comment

      • #4
        pantone354
        Member
        • Mar 2017
        • 117

        I don't have enough information to formulate an opinion, which is why I'm hoping my fellow calgunners will help out.

        Comment

        • #5
          teflondog
          Veteran Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 4011

          Originally posted by pantone354
          He said you wouldn't take a $5,000 Kimber 1911 into combat because the tolerances are too tight.
          Kimber makes a $5k gun?
          Originally posted by G. Michael Hopf
          Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

          Comment

          • #6
            pantone354
            Member
            • Mar 2017
            • 117

            I think he was exaggerating to make a point.

            Comment

            • #7
              k1dude
              I need a LIFE!!
              • May 2009
              • 14628

              I didn't watch the video, but tight tolerances are bad news when you're trying to shed dirt, grime, sand, and mud. They can grind your action to a halt. Carbon/primer fouling will also affect you quicker than with looser tolerances.

              Loose tolerances are what makes the AK so reliable in battlefield conditions.
              "Show me a young conservative and I'll show you a man without a heart. Show me an old liberal and I'll show you a man without a brain." - Sir Winston Churchill

              "I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!" - Senator Barry Goldwater

              Comment

              • #8
                808@515
                Senior Member
                • May 2013
                • 1047

                I wouldn't take a $5000 Kimber either. That's what I have Glocks for.

                Comment

                • #9
                  pantone354
                  Member
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 117

                  Would a SA TRP be considered to have "tight tolerances"? The FBI Pro Model used in urban situations is a far different application than battlefield combat, but apparently Chris Kyle used the TRP in combat. Should he have?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    pantone354
                    Member
                    • Mar 2017
                    • 117

                    That is my argument as well...3 Glocks or 1 SA TRP.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      teflondog
                      Veteran Member
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 4011

                      My 1911s are all tight and they will malfunction when they're not properly lubed. There's no play between the slide and frame so the rails have a lot of friction when they're dry. My Glocks on the other hand will still run without a drop of lube in them. The slide to frame fit is so loose that they would function even if they were dropped in the mud.
                      Originally posted by G. Michael Hopf
                      Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        pantone354
                        Member
                        • Mar 2017
                        • 117

                        Originally posted by teflondog
                        My 1911s are all tight and they will malfunction when they're not properly lubed. There's no play between the slide and frame so the rails have a lot of friction when they're dry. My Glocks on the other hand will still run without a drop of lube in them. The slide to frame fit is so loose that they would function even if they were dropped in the mud.
                        Thanks teflondog...that is the sort of info I was looking for.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Mystery_Milk
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2017
                          • 541

                          This is an age-old argument. You see torture tests of people dumping sand into guns and pitting it against an AK to try to measure reliability, and the AK always loses because loose tolerances means that it's easier for outside stuff to get into the gun.

                          But realistically if you had your gun out in a sandstorm for half a day it'd be a lot easier to shake the sand out of the AK and get it back into action than it would be to do the same for a gun with tight tolerances.

                          I've seen people take their Glocks out in extreme conditions just for testing and every time they fire the gun blows chunks of snow or whatever out of almost every available opening. A Kimber 1911 might just jam up.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            therealnickb
                            King- Lifetime
                            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                            • Oct 2011
                            • 8919

                            Originally posted by pantone354
                            I think he was exaggerating to make a point.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              BarrettM99
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2015
                              • 2199

                              Originally posted by 808@515
                              I wouldn't take a $5000 Kimber either. That's what I have Glocks for.
                              There are $5K Kimbers?

                              I heard of a $5000 reward for info leading to the arrest of perpetrators of a smash and grab gun store robbery where some Kimbers were left behind.
                              Last edited by BarrettM99; 10-03-2018, 11:30 AM.
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1