Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Sig Over Glock?.... Not So Fast.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • billt
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 1179

    Sig Over Glock?.... Not So Fast.



    This is not the kind of advertising a gun company needs.

    If common sense was so common, why don't liberals possess any?
  • #2
    solipsism
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 1332

    Steyr is suing them due to the P320 design allegedly infringing on a patent they hold.

    Comment

    • #3
      Strykeback
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 1574

      Interesting read, and crazy that a company of that size and prominent in the market took that long to get the solution done.

      Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • #4
        billt
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 1179

        Originally posted by Strykeback
        Interesting read, and crazy that a company of that size and prominent in the market took that long to get the solution done.
        That's just it. They never found a solution. New Jersey did by purchasing Glock 17's. That's the part that got me the most. They don't seem capable of fixing it. If it were a simple case of defective parts, and they rectified the problem by identifying and replacing them, then all is well and good. That can happen to any manufacturer of durable goods. How many motor vehicles get recalled and fixed every year? This however, seems like more of a case of, "Cash For Clunkers".
        If common sense was so common, why don't liberals possess any?

        Comment

        • #5
          billt
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 1179

          Another thing that got me was the cost of the holsters. $865,000.00 for 3,000 holsters divides out to $288.33 per holster. Nowhere near the $10K toilet seat, but enough to question, that's for sure. In Sig's defense, they shouldn't get stuck with that one. Do any of these people in government, who have the financial power to procure this equipment, possess a single ounce of common sense?
          If common sense was so common, why don't liberals possess any?

          Comment

          • #6
            teflondog
            Veteran Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 4011

            I'm glad I got my P229 back in 2009. I hear that the older batches are way more consistent in reliability compared to the current production, which can be hit or miss.
            Originally posted by G. Michael Hopf
            Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

            Comment

            • #7
              teflondog
              Veteran Member
              • Jun 2009
              • 4011

              Originally posted by billt
              Another thing that got me was the cost of the holsters. $865,000.00 for 3,000 holsters divides out to $288.33 per holster. Nowhere near the $10K toilet seat, but enough to question, that's for sure. In Sig's defense, they shouldn't get stuck with that one. Do any of these people in government, who have the financial power to procure this equipment, possess a single ounce of common sense?
              Maybe they purchased more than 3,000 holsters?
              Originally posted by G. Michael Hopf
              Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

              Comment

              • #8
                robledo
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2013
                • 978

                Bearing Arms posted a positive article about Glocks? Time to buy a lottery ticket.

                Comment

                • #9
                  billt
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 1179

                  Originally posted by teflondog
                  Maybe they purchased more than 3,000 holsters?
                  If that were the case, (and I'm not saying it isn't), they couldn't realistically expect Sig to pay for the cost of the extras.
                  If common sense was so common, why don't liberals possess any?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    GlockN'Roll
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2015
                    • 3702

                    Originally posted by billt
                    That's just it.

                    They never found a solution.

                    New Jersey did by purchasing Glock 17's.

                    That's the part that got me the most.

                    They don't seem capable of fixing it.

                    If it were a simple case of defective parts,
                    and they rectified the problem by identifying and replacing them, then all is well and good.

                    That can happen to any manufacturer of durable goods. How many motor vehicles get recalled and fixed every year?

                    This however, seems like more of a case of, "Cash For Clunkers".
                    What? the oft vaunted Sig's aren't better and more reliable than Glocks?

                    How can this be? This changes everything!

                    What happens next, CZ fanboys buying Glocks?





                    Oh the horror...
                    Real Californian...

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Dimitri A.
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 931

                      Originally posted by Strykeback
                      Interesting read, and crazy that a company of that size and prominent in the market took that long to get the solution done.

                      Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
                      Not with Ron Cohen at the helm it's not. He ruined Kimber's rep when he was in charge there by going with sub-par parts from bottom rung suppliers, and he's doing the same thing at Sig; increasing profits by skimping on quality.
                      Last edited by Dimitri A.; 06-07-2017, 9:26 AM.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Crazed_SS
                        Veteran Member
                        • Dec 2005
                        • 4114

                        I have a modern P220R. It's had problems. Not a fan of newer Sigs.
                        My old P6/P225 from 30 years ago is amazing.


                        Looking for a Glock 17 right now.
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Carcassonne
                          Veteran Member
                          • Jul 2012
                          • 4897

                          Originally posted by billt
                          ... Do any of these people in government, who have the financial power to procure this equipment, possess a single ounce of common sense?
                          No

                          .
                          Be sure to ask your doctor if depression, rectal bleeding, and suicide are right for you.

                          In the United States a person's expertise on a subject is inversely proportional to their knowledge of the subject: The less they know about something, the more they become an expert on it.

                          I am being held hostage in a giant insane asylum called Earth.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                          • #15
                            billt
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2012
                            • 1179

                            Originally posted by GlockN'Roll
                            What? the oft vaunted Sig's aren't better and more reliable than Glocks?
                            I think they were at the point they were desperate for a gun that simply WORKED. It appeared for whatever reason, Sig could not supply that.
                            If common sense was so common, why don't liberals possess any?

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1