Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

"Hand fitted" kimber?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    LowThudd
    Veteran Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 3608

    Originally posted by stormvet
    Wait your mode of transportation is uber and we're suppose to take advice from you...right.
    Maybe he assumes we are all drinking? Projecting possibly.

    Comment

    • #62
      Carcassonne
      Veteran Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 4897

      I know someone who has a small Kimber 45 pistol. I do not know the model name, but it is one of their shortest models that was available 15+ years ago: It is the one that needs a special tool to disassemble. He finally got it "broken-in", and it supposedly now shoots flawlessly. Yes, it took about 15 years to do it. I do not understand why a gun needs to be broken-in.



      .
      Be sure to ask your doctor if depression, rectal bleeding, and suicide are right for you.

      In the United States a person's expertise on a subject is inversely proportional to their knowledge of the subject: The less they know about something, the more they become an expert on it.

      I am being held hostage in a giant insane asylum called Earth.

      Comment

      • #63
        MrFeetZ
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 545

        Originally posted by CouchOperator
        No, but they sure do like to give you plastic mainspring housings and mag releases, MIM galore, tons of loose breech, godawful checkering, poor slide to frame fit, only one mag, write fake claims of a "custom shop" on some of their guns, and a long history of known barrel rust. If thats your thing, go for it

        I have a couple kimbers, couple DW, S&W, Sig and colts. Only one of them came with plastic MSH, and it was a colt. The loosest ones are the Colts, and the Colts have no checkering.

        So, by your logic I guess Colts suck too?

        Comment

        • #64
          CAWCGuy
          Member
          CGN Contributor
          • Apr 2017
          • 107

          Originally posted by CAL.BAR
          EXACTLY! I've seen more problems with these super tight tolerance guns than I ever have in standard off the rack 1911's
          having shot the original Army Colt 1911s while in the service, later retail Colt 1911s and now Wilson "hand fitted" guns... I can safely say that in MY opinion that is not a fact.
          Wilson Combat CQB Compact (CA), Supergrade Tactical Custom / Les Baer UM-5 1.5"/ Sig 220 Equinox .45ACP
          Weatherby .460 Mark V / Remington 700 30.06
          CRPA Member
          NRA Life Member

          Comment

          • #65
            stormvet
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Mar 2010
            • 12681

            Originally posted by Carcassonne
            I know someone who has a small Kimber 45 pistol. I do not know the model name, but it is one of their shortest models that was available 15+ years ago: It is the one that needs a special tool to disassemble. He finally got it "broken-in", and it supposedly now shoots flawlessly. Yes, it took about 15 years to do it. I do not understand why a gun needs to be broken-in.



            .
            Come on man, that says way more about your 50 rounds a year friend then about the gun. And I don't believe in break in periods, but I know a guy that knows a guy that is a expert in all things that need 15 + years to break in.
            Im a warmonger baby, I got blood in my eyes and I'm looking at you.

            Comment

            • #66
              jeffrice6
              Calguns Addict
              • Jan 2006
              • 5174

              Love how a Kimber "fitting" question brings out the haters!!!
              Unless a Kimber post starts with my Kimber: Treat it as Internet garbage ~
              WTB: S&W 617 4" 10 shot Pre-Lock

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1