Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Ruger SR22, S&W M&P 22, or Walther P22

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Unbroken
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2016
    • 75

    Ruger SR22, S&W M&P 22, or Walther P22

    My wife is looking for a .22 LR semi-auto and can't decide which of the above or any other .22's she should be looking at.

    Pros, cons, any insight would be appreciated.
  • #2
    Garv the innocent
    RSG Minion, Senior
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Apr 2014
    • 9009

    My wife loves her SR 22, small and easy to shoot, great for plinking.
    A friend and my brother in law have the M&P 22 and like it, more full size.
    Both the above have been reliable.
    The M&P has a longer barrel, probably more accurate.

    Have not shot the P22, but hear it is picky on ammo.

    I would try to have her shoot the Ruger and Smith, but both are off roster.
    Originally posted by Kestryll:
    It never fails to amuse me how people get outraged but fail to tell the whole story in their rants....

    Comment

    • #3
      Unbroken
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2016
      • 75

      Thanks Garv!

      Yeah, she tried the SR22 yesterday and really liked it. Kind of hard to in the marketplace.

      The Walther is pretty easy to find. From what I understand, the M&P and the Walther are similar.

      Comment

      • #4
        Garv the innocent
        RSG Minion, Senior
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Apr 2014
        • 9009

        She should put her hands on a Buckmark too.
        On roster.
        Kind of heavy and looks clunky, but a nice shooter.

        Also consider a Ruger Mark II or III, off roster and a bit tough to reassemble until you get used to it, but nice shooter as well.

        (In before someone says S&W 41.)
        Originally posted by Kestryll:
        It never fails to amuse me how people get outraged but fail to tell the whole story in their rants....

        Comment

        • #5
          'ol shooter
          Veteran Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 4646

          Out of the three, my M&P. The P-22 has fixable reliability issues, but for out of the box performance, it's my Smith. I also have a Ruger 22-45, unreliable out of the box, lot's of issues, and a couple conversion kits that work fine, a Kimber and a Beretta.
          sigpic
          Bob B.
          (\__/)
          (='.'=)
          (")_(")

          Comment

          • #6
            creampuff
            • Jan 2006
            • 3730

            I thought only the Walter on is on the list. Are you acquiring through PPT?

            Comment

            • #7
              MajorSideburns
              Senior Member
              • May 2013
              • 1654

              Originally posted by creampuff
              I thought only the Walter on is on the list. Are you acquiring through PPT?
              Yes, out of his list the walther is the only one on roster. So the obvious pro for it would be cheap and easy to find. The cons for the others listed would be having to pay $800+ for a simple 22lr handgun...

              Comment

              • #8
                fmunk
                Veteran Member
                • Apr 2011
                • 3896

                Originally posted by Unbroken
                My wife is looking for a .22 LR semi-auto and can't decide which of the above or any other .22's she should be looking at.

                Pros, cons, any insight would be appreciated.
                I think I would go with whichever that is known to take cheap ammo. M&P 22 is said to be like that right out of the box. But, I've also seen posts online saying they aren't. IIRC, the M&P and Walther are made by the same manufacturer (Umarex?).

                There is also the GSG 1911-22. Had one for a while, sold it. Won't take cheap ammo reliably, but can be slicked up to take cheap ammo (removing paint from rails and polishing up rails).
                Last edited by fmunk; 07-03-2016, 7:20 PM.


                FS: Atlas Bipod, Custom G23 RMR slide, ETS mags, Jagerwerks, Recover G26/27, CZ Scorpion bits, etc.

                Comment

                • #9
                  dyson
                  Veteran Member
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 4342

                  Buckmark is prob the best and easiest to find new

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    fmunk
                    Veteran Member
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 3896

                    Originally posted by dyson
                    Buckmark is prob the best and easiest to find new
                    Yup. Saw at least one at Rifle Gear in Fountain Valley yesterday, along side some fancy Beretta target 22 (the 87 Target).


                    FS: Atlas Bipod, Custom G23 RMR slide, ETS mags, Jagerwerks, Recover G26/27, CZ Scorpion bits, etc.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      creampuff
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 3730

                      Originally posted by fmunk
                      I think I would go with whichever that is known to take cheap ammo. M&P 22 is said to be like that right out of the box. But, I've also seen posts online saying they aren't. IIRC, the M&P and Walther are made by the same manufacturer (Umarex?).

                      There is also the GSG 1911-22. Had one for a while, sold it. Won't take cheap ammo reliably, but can be slicked up to take cheap ammo (removing paint from rails and polishing up rails).
                      My M&P22 shoots everything right out the box, but I do like the trigger on my GSG 1911-22 better. The GSG is made out of hot wheels pot metal, but it is one of my favorite 22's. It's just plain fun to shoot. It is a lottery though. My first GSG took forever to tweak to get it to shoot correctly. My 2nd was great out of the box.

                      My Buckmark UFX doesn't have the fun factor of the GSG but it will be what I will use to help my son learn how to shoot when he gets a little bit older. It's a classic reliable 22, nice trigger, and probably is a much better gun than I am a shooter.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        fmunk
                        Veteran Member
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 3896

                        Originally posted by creampuff
                        My M&P22 shoots everything right out the box, but I do like the trigger on my GSG 1911-22 better. The GSG is made out of hot wheels pot metal, but it is one of my favorite 22's. It's just plain fun to shoot. It is a lottery though. My first GSG took forever to tweak to get it to shoot correctly. My 2nd was great out of the box.

                        My Buckmark UFX doesn't have the fun factor of the GSG but it will be what I will use to help my son learn how to shoot when he gets a little bit older. It's a classic reliable 22, nice trigger, and probably is a much better gun than I am a shooter.
                        Yah the 1911-22 was fun and had some compatibility with 1911 parts to boot. As you said, materials and finish was not top shelf, but it worked. I just found myself losing interest in 22LR rather quickly... hence the sale of the 10/22 in my sig. I have to say though, 22LR plinking was much more fun in a free state. Here, in CA, I found myself loading more than shooting. And since I don't get out to the desert as often as I'd like, precious trips and time were dedicated to larger calibers. Over the past few years I've thought about picking up a M&P 22 several times, since I have a few M&Ps, but always end up asking myself "how much use will I get out of it?"


                        FS: Atlas Bipod, Custom G23 RMR slide, ETS mags, Jagerwerks, Recover G26/27, CZ Scorpion bits, etc.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          plumbermark
                          Junior Member
                          • Jan 2013
                          • 42

                          I purchased a Ruger 22/45 a few years back. It sat locked up for a while but I just did a few tandumcross modifications to it and I love it again. It goes to every range trip with me. Sometimes it's the only gun I shoot. It's very reliable even with sub sonic Remington lead nose. Customizing it was a blast and very easy. Tons of drop in parts. I have the sr22 as well but it doesn't compare to my 22/45 in my opinion.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            creampuff
                            • Jan 2006
                            • 3730

                            Originally posted by fmunk
                            . Over the past few years I've thought about picking up a M&P 22 several times, since I have a few M&Ps, but always end up asking myself "how much use will I get out of it?"
                            OP, sorry about the derail. My M&P 22 is my dust collector. I'd sell it but I don't want to sell any of my off rosters in case my son takes a liking to it years from now.

                            The one gripe I have about the M&P22 is you would think one of the purposes of purchasing this is to practice 22LR instead of 9mm on the M&P 9. The M&P22 is a single action fire weapon though, so for me the trigger doesn't match the M&P9. Switching back and forth between the M&P22 and M&P9 actually messed me up more than helped me when it came to practice time. I guess I should have known that going in, since there aren't any striker fire rimfires

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Unbroken
                              Junior Member
                              • Jan 2016
                              • 75

                              Thanks for all of the replies! It sounds like I'll have to look more into the Buckmark

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1