Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Hi-Cap magazines: any pitfalls?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kern 44
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2003
    • 24

    Hi-Cap magazines: any pitfalls?

    --
    I'm new onboard, and want to say thanks for this great Forum.

    I did a search and saw that if you bought/had your hi-cap magazines before Jan 1, 2000 you are OK to keep them. I know we can't sell them or give them away inside Cal, or bring any more into the State.

    I had all mine well before Jan 1, 2000 but have some questions:

    1. Do you need receipts or other proof? (I have receipts for the guns.)
    2. I have a CCW permit. Would I be wiser to just carry 10-rounders?
    3. Any pitfals using the hi-caps?

    Many thanks.


    -----------------------------
    Last edited by Kern 44; 12-29-2008, 11:54 AM. Reason: Clarity
  • #2
    Backcountry
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 427

    1) No.

    2) If the speed limit is 55mph and you typically drive 10 mph to be "wiser", then yes, carry 10 round mags if you have a ccw permit.

    I'm not "wiser" and I carry whatever I want.
    NSDQ

    Comment

    • #3
      CHS
      Moderator Emeritus
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Jan 2008
      • 11338

      Originally posted by Kern 44
      1. Do you need receipts or other proof? (I have receipts for the guns.)
      No.

      Originally posted by Kern 44
      2. I have a CCW permit. Would I be wiser to just carry 10-rounders?
      No.

      Originally posted by Kern 44
      3. Any pitfals using the hi-caps?
      No.
      Please read the Calguns Wiki
      Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
      --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

      Comment

      • #4
        GP3
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 1392

        Related, but slighty OT question:

        If you don't need proof that they are pre-ban, why do people abide by the 10 round capacity law (pistols)?

        Comment

        • #5
          Black Majik
          Calguns Addict
          • Oct 2005
          • 9695

          Originally posted by GP3
          Related, but slighty OT question:

          If you don't need proof that they are pre-ban, why do people abide by the 10 round capacity law (pistols)?
          Because it's the law.

          Comment

          • #6
            CHS
            Moderator Emeritus
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Jan 2008
            • 11338

            Originally posted by GP3
            Related, but slighty OT question:

            If you don't need proof that they are pre-ban, why do people abide by the 10 round capacity law (pistols)?
            Originally posted by Black Majik
            Because it's the law.
            And many people still don't.

            It is the law, but it's an almost-unenforceable law. With that said, don't do anything stupid because the law has TEETH.
            Please read the Calguns Wiki
            Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
            --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

            Comment

            • #7
              Black Majik
              Calguns Addict
              • Oct 2005
              • 9695

              While the law is largely unenforceable, it seems to be a regular topic... many which sound like they're looking for advice on how to skirt this law.

              Comment

              • #8
                GP3
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2008
                • 1392

                I was just shocked to hear and wanted to clarify. I always assumed that some sort of proof was needed.

                <-- Law abiding.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Bug Splat
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 6561

                  Originally posted by Kern 44
                  3. Any pitfals using the hi-caps?
                  -
                  Everytime you load up a std cap mag a puppy is killed.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    JTROKS
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 13093

                    I saw a kid at the range and he mentioned he got a Glock * for his 22nd or 23rd birthday. He had high cap mags with his glock. Hmmmm... That kind of scenario smells like fish all over it. Is it believable enough that he had possession of those high cap mags when he was 15? Can the state prove he's braking the law? Probably not unless the mags have date stamped on when they were produced... Well who's to say that the kid broke the mags and he bought mag kits to repair them. Nothing on the law saying he must use non date stamped parts. The law is the law, you break it you better be prepared to do the time.
                    The wise man said just find your place
                    In the eye of the storm
                    Seek the roses along the way
                    Just beware of the thorns...
                    K. Meine

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      neomentat
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 1404

                      hmmm.... hi-caps,

                      do you need proof? not under normal conditions

                      enforcement? there's not very much active enforcement

                      can you get in trouble?

                      heck ya, if you happen to shoot someone in a legitimate self defense scenario using hi-caps or happens to be flunting them infront of under cover sheriffs @ Burrow Canyon doing an OLL sting (has happened many times) guess what, there's going to be a whole lot of scrutiny on your hi-caps. even if you won't go to jail as the best outcome if the local PD can't prove anything, you can bet your arse that you'll be spending a fortune to hire a lawyer for your defense. oh yes, the local PD will charge you with felony possession of hi-caps even if they know they can't prove it (or can they?).

                      So if you have legal hi-caps and all the paperwork to back up the claim that they're legal, then use it by all means. If there is the slightest doubt, I don't think it's worth all the potential hassel. Afterall, it's a felony, don't chance it. If you get convicted you will never again be able to have any firearms, and good luck on getting a job.
                      Last edited by neomentat; 12-29-2008, 3:34 PM.
                      "I will not fear, fear is the mind killer... I will face my fear and let it pass through me, only I will remain." Bene Gesserit training

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        redcliff
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 5676

                        Originally posted by neomentat
                        hmmm.... hi-caps,

                        do you need proof? not under normal conditions

                        enforcement? there's not very much active enforcement

                        can you get in trouble?

                        heck ya, if you happen to shoot someone in a legitimate self defense scenario using hi-caps or happens to be flunting them infront of under cover sheriffs @ Burrow Canyon doing an OLL sting (has happened many times) guess what, there's going to be a whole lot of scrutiny on your hi-caps. even if you won't go to jail as the best outcome if the local PD can't prove anything, you can bet your arse that you'll be spending a fortune to hire a lawyer for your defense. oh yes, the local PD will charge you with felony possession of hi-caps even if they know they can't prove it (or can they?).

                        So if you have legal hi-caps and all the paperwork to back up the claim that they're legal, then use it by all means. If there is the slightest doubt, I don't think it's worth all the potential hassel. Afterall, it's a felony, don't chance it. If you get convicted you will never again be able to have any firearms, and good luck on getting a job.
                        And just what crime would they be charging you with? Posession is not a felony, nor is it a crime.

                        I'm not advocating people break the law by importing them, but most of us old timers don't have receipts for the high cap magazines we purchased 20-30 years ago. Back then a receipt for a high capacity magazine was like your grocery receipts; they meant nothing and there was no reason to keep them.
                        Last edited by redcliff; 12-29-2008, 4:39 PM.
                        "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
                        "What we get away with isn't usually the same as what's good for us"
                        "An extended slide stop is the second most useless part you can put on a 1911"

                        "While Ruger DA revolvers may be built like a tank, they have the aesthetics of one also,
                        although I suppose there are a few tanks which I owe an apology to for that remark"

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Captain Evilstomper
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 775

                          they might try to get you for manufacuring a hi-cap. that being said, there are a lot of police and DA's that try to throw things at the wall jus to see what sticks. i mean what do they care? they aren't out of pocket when it gets thrown out of court, nor do they suffer an undue consequences later trying to get their legally owned property back. it kind of sucks being a law-abiding citizen and being afraid to exercise your rights in a police-nanny state like kalifornia.
                          Reason has seldom failed us because it has seldom been tried

                          Better a cruel truth than a comfortable delusion
                          -- Edward Abbey

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            becxltoo984
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 657

                            The only pitfall i see is . The bad guy maybe armed with a plus 10 and you left your high caps at home.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Warhawk014
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2008
                              • 1498

                              it is pretty hard to prove that you had high caps before the ban. but if your walking around with 16 round mags for a SA XD 9mm of course your going to get poped for importing. those guns werent in california untill after the ban. and if there is a question as to how they will pop you, just think, if the gun didnt exist before the ban. and came after the ban went into affect. how else could you have gotten high caps for that gun.
                              http://www.shop42a.com/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1