So, single shot exemption is dead?

[E Michael]

You need to know if you need to buy the lubricant for the gun yourself?

[Oldnoob]

Too funny yet too true. So about those 1k plus Glocks....

[customiiguy]

The lube is for your *** cus you will be raped duh!

[el_clingon]

if you want one, just keep your eyes out in the sells forum. they come by from time to time.

[3000+]

Oops, my bad for being dense haha. I already expected to pay extra for it and decided that $25 for each hour of paperwork and transfer process on the sender's side would be sufficient...?

Also, does this loophole also work for banned-by-name rifles such as Knight's (prior to bullet button)?

[davidwow]

The subcompact is great, double trigger is long though. SA is awesome. Wish it came with night sites though

[Rhyyke]

Oops, my bad for being dense haha. I already expected to pay extra for it and decided that $25 for each hour of paperwork and transfer process on the sender's side would be sufficient...?

Also, does this loophole also work for banned-by-name rifles such as Knight's (prior to bullet button)?

You can only PPT an off-roster handgun with both you and the seller in person, the seller must be a CA resident, and the gun must be in state.

[Mr. Patis]

How come?

Hahahahah...soda just came out of my nose

[DannyInSoCal]

Oops, my bad for being dense haha. I already expected to pay extra for it and decided that $25 for each hour of paperwork and transfer process on the sender's side would be sufficient...?

Also, does this loophole also work for banned-by-name rifles such as Knight's (prior to bullet button)?

$50?

Smallest markup ever for an off-roster sidearm.

Expect $200 or more over MSRP...

[Fishslayer]

Because off roster ppt guns carry what I call " the CA premium"..

With a reacharound maybe but probably not...

[ke6guj]

Oops, my bad for being dense haha. I already expected to pay extra for it and decided that $25 for each hour of paperwork and transfer process on the sender's side would be sufficient...?

not likely. If I had a Sphinx SDP Subcompact and wanted to sell it, I know that I couldn't easily replace it. I also know that for a buyer, his options to buy it are limited. based on supply-and-demand, I am going to price it where I would be willing to let go of it. when $400 Glock 42's sell for $800 or more, a $1000+ Sphinx might be going for $1500 or more, depending on the seller.

Also, does this loophole also work for banned-by-name rifles such as Knight's (prior to bullet button)?

nope. banned by named means exactly that, BANNED. you can't possess them (unless it is registered to your as an AW)

the roster does not ban handguns from possession if they are not listed. it just means that Dealers may not transfer them except under limited circumstances. PPT/consignments are the primary way that you would get an off-roster handgun in CA today.

[johnwin84]

i have a unfired sphinx spd champagne. i would not let it go unless i got a great offer or trade. Most used Spd are going for 1500-1700.

[3000+]

This is another dumb question, but if your PPT needs to be a CA resident as well, how would they get an off-roster in the first place? Are you saying the only way to even have one is if someone else purchased it through single-shot exemption earlier?

[mnichols]

This thread is full of win. My favorite all week

[Drew Eckhardt]

This is another dumb question, but if your PPT needs to be a CA resident as well, how would they get an off-roster in the first place? Are you saying the only way to even have one is if someone else purchased it through single-shot exemption earlier?

They can buy for their own personal use while living elsewhere, move here, then suffer a horrible calamity which causes them to sell.