686 S&W or Ruger GP100?

[M1Atdk]

I want to get another Revolver but dont have either of the above which would you guys recommend?

[nobs11]

I've been researching this question because I'm in the market as well. From all I've read and heard, the GP100 is a good gun and built like a tank. Good carry and defensive gun. For target/range use everyone recommends the 686. I've handled both and the 686 has a better trigger and more refined action. The S&Ws also hold their value better. Probably the revolver experts here have more things to say. I ended up going for a 625 in the end.

[EOD3]

Either revolver will probably outlive you with normal use. For me, the smith handles better than the ruger. If however, you plan to shoot max charge heavy bullet reloads, go with the ruger.

[Snapping Twig]

It's a Ford/Chevy argument. Both are medium frame, super strong and accurate. Neither is stronger than the other. Other frames this isn't the case and the Ruger is stronger, not here however.

I'm a S&W guy, always have been, but I own a few Rugers too and they are well made.

Both Ruger and S&W make SS and blue steel versions of these medium frame .357s, so try before you buy.

The bottom line is that the trigger is generally better on the S&W and a trigger job makes that even more so. Less commonly the Ruger trigger can be made as nice, but it's harder to do.

[c good]

Both are excellent. I have found my S&W's just feel better in my hand and actions seem to be more refined. 686's are hard to beat. I like my 4" best.
hth c good

[tankerman]

S&W and Colt are like Ford and Chevy.

Ruger is like Hyundai.

It's a Ford/Chevy argument. Both are medium frame, super strong and accurate. Neither is stronger than the other. Other frames this isn't the case and the Ruger is stronger, not here however.

I'm a S&W guy, always have been, but I own a few Rugers too and they are well made.

Both Ruger and S&W make SS and blue steel versions of these medium frame .357s, so try before you buy.

The bottom line is that the trigger is generally better on the S&W and a trigger job makes that even more so. Less commonly the Ruger trigger can be made as nice, but it's harder to do.

[ar15barrels]

It's a Ford/Chevy argument.

No.
This is a Ford/GMC arguement.
It's easy to see that the S&W is more finely appointed and finished and the ruger is built like a tank.
Choose one: tough as all hell, or nicer finish & nicer to shoot...

[tziggs]

I've had a great experience with my 4" 686. Highly recommended.

[tenring]

No.
This is a Ford/GMC arguement.
It's easy to see that the S&W is more finely appointed and finished and the ruger is built like a tank.
Choose one: tough as all hell, or nicer finish & nicer to shoot...

Agreed

[SNEAKS]

My GP100 6" that I sold to my brother is a great revolver. I was able to hit golfballs at about 8 yards with no problem.

[Snapping Twig]

OK, I was trying to be diplomatic. Everyone votes with their $$, so here's my vote.

http://

I had this in 6" in '83, then I had it in stainless 2.5", but the short ejector rod bothered me - didn't pop the shells out, then I had it in stainless 4" and sold it to Riviepop - thanks man, we both got what we needed - I prefer it in blue steel.

4" 586/686 rocks!

[RT13]

GP100 all the way! If youa re talking about a new 686 w/ IL, forget about ti even more. GP100 rocks!

[M1Atdk]

Snapping Twig i love that 586!!! If you ever want to give it to me just send me a PM.

[586L-Frame]

[tmuller]

I love both my 686's for what it's worth........