My recent interests have been in the "mid" tier handguns, such as the VP9, HK45 (yes, I am a HK, & Sig, fanboy), FNX45. The 1911 is my most accurate, I guess because that is what I trained on it the most. The Glock 19 is my first adult purchase but I just like it because of it's reliability.
After watching many reviews that compare this gun to that, etc., I am wondering, when push comes to shove, for the beginner/intermediate shooter like myself (i.e. I am definitely not Jerry Miculek), do the differences in .02 micron trigger take, slightly cooler grip pattern, 1mm higher beavertail, etc, really matter?
I mean, I am not a match shooter (though that would be cool one day), so the extent of my sport will be hitting a paper or steel target or self-defense and I presume that in self-defense, if you achieve a 2" grouping, it is just as great as a 1" grouping in times of stress unless you're starring in a major Hollywood action movie.
I just want to hit my target center mass consistently, no matter what handgun I use. Am I wrong to think this simply about my firearms?
After watching many reviews that compare this gun to that, etc., I am wondering, when push comes to shove, for the beginner/intermediate shooter like myself (i.e. I am definitely not Jerry Miculek), do the differences in .02 micron trigger take, slightly cooler grip pattern, 1mm higher beavertail, etc, really matter?
I mean, I am not a match shooter (though that would be cool one day), so the extent of my sport will be hitting a paper or steel target or self-defense and I presume that in self-defense, if you achieve a 2" grouping, it is just as great as a 1" grouping in times of stress unless you're starring in a major Hollywood action movie.
I just want to hit my target center mass consistently, no matter what handgun I use. Am I wrong to think this simply about my firearms?


Comment