🛑 Bruen Means NOTHING in California?

[Cheekyfella]

Fellow Patriots – It's Time to Wake Up: VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA and CHAD BIANCO
I never thought I'd be in this position — forced to file a federal lawsuit just to exercise a God-given right that's already protected by the Constitution. But here I am, in the case VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA and CHAD BIANCO, fighting not just for myself, but for every law-abiding Californian who’s had their right to carry crushed under this state’s burdensome and unconstitutional CCW scheme.

Let me ask you:

How is it “freedom” when you need to pay hundreds of dollars,

take a 16-hour class that teaches almost nothing,

jump through vague “moral character” hoops,

and still get denied… for no real reason?


How is it constitutional when even veterans, FFL holders, and people with out-of-state CCWs get denied simply because the sheriff says so?

The Supreme Court in Bruen said this kind of gatekeeping is illegal. Yet Sheriff Chad Bianco continues enforcing this broken scheme — while falsely branding it as “pro-2A.” And now, he’s even embroiled in a $100 million lawsuit after falsely accusing an innocent man, Vem Miller, of an assassination attempt on President Trump. This isn’t just incompetence. This is tyranny hiding behind a badge and a flag.

VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA and CHAD BIANCO is one of the only cases directly challenging the CCW scheme on its face as unconstitutional. This isn’t just about my rights — it’s about yours, your family’s, and every citizen’s right to defend themselves without government permission slips.

I’m fighting this pro se, with no fancy lawyers or big organizations backing me — because apparently, fighting the actual scheme doesn’t bring in enough donations.

But you can help. Spread the word. Talk about this case. Share it on your forums, groups, and pages. Because if we don’t stand now, the next generation won’t even know what freedom was.

> “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” – MLK
So what are we doing about it right here in California?

[Rickybillegas]

I thought Chad was very pro-CCW. He claimed late last year he has issued 50,000 permits in his tenure in a county of 2.5 million. That's probably one of the highest % in the state.
How specific on your reasons for denial? Also, remember although Bianco sets the policy, I think it's up to the investigator assigned to you and the officer in charge of the unit to make decisions.
I doubt that Bianco looks at any of the individual applications.

[turbolarry]

Any chance you could upload or post your complaint/filings? I don't have a PACER account.

[BAJ475]

Any chance you could upload or post your complaint/filings? I don't have a PACER account.

Try Court Listener -- https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...s-v-rob-bonta/

[Cheekyfella]

Sorry. This website after migration is finicky. I wasn't able to log in. I used to have a great rating here. I just spoke to a 2A organization and they are must likely willing to help me and think I have a great case.

[Snoopy47]

The moral character thing seems to be the open ended way to deny folks. However, it should also be a slam dunk for the applicant if they spoon feed the reference letter to their references.

That said. I don't know all the IA's reference procedures. Mine was a letter, and I made sure it was a minimalist letter.

*************
I Joe Blow, attest to Snoopy47's (xxx-xx-1234) character, integrity, and decision making as it pertains to the responsibilities associated with a Conceal Carry Weapons permit as prescribed by the laws of the State of California.

I have known Snoopy as (insert association scenario such as school, work, social, church, etc) for X years.

The contact for this reference is Joe Blow at (123)-456-7890

***********
1) Attest to the character as a requirement of the process.
2) Disclose the association and time of relationship.
3) Provide a point of contact.

THAT'S IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[DolphinFan]

Fellow Patriots – It's Time to Wake Up: VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA and CHAD BIANCO
I never thought I'd be in this position — forced to file a federal lawsuit just to exercise a God-given right that's already protected by the Constitution. But here I am, in the case VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA and CHAD BIANCO, fighting not just for myself, but for every law-abiding Californian who’s had their right to carry crushed under this state’s burdensome and unconstitutional CCW scheme.

Let me ask you:

How is it “freedom” when you need to pay hundreds of dollars,

take a 16-hour class that teaches almost nothing,

jump through vague “moral character” hoops,

and still get denied… for no real reason?


How is it constitutional when even veterans, FFL holders, and people with out-of-state CCWs get denied simply because the sheriff says so?

The Supreme Court in Bruen said this kind of gatekeeping is illegal. Yet Sheriff Chad Bianco continues enforcing this broken scheme — while falsely branding it as “pro-2A.” And now, he’s even embroiled in a $100 million lawsuit after falsely accusing an innocent man, Vem Miller, of an assassination attempt on President Trump. This isn’t just incompetence. This is tyranny hiding behind a badge and a flag.

VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA and CHAD BIANCO is one of the only cases directly challenging the CCW scheme on its face as unconstitutional. This isn’t just about my rights — it’s about yours, your family’s, and every citizen’s right to defend themselves without government permission slips.

I’m fighting this pro se, with no fancy lawyers or big organizations backing me — because apparently, fighting the actual scheme doesn’t bring in enough donations.

But you can help. Spread the word. Talk about this case. Share it on your forums, groups, and pages. Because if we don’t stand now, the next generation won’t even know what freedom was.

> “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” – MLK
So what are we doing about it right here in California?

Under Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham AL 1969, the Supreme Court said that, "When confronted with a law/rule that restricts an enumerated right, "You may exercise your right, "WITH IMPUNITY".

NO ONE in the State of California has been convicted of, "carrying a handgun outside the home for self defense", since the passing of Bruen.
IF caught, you will be arrested, your firearm will be confiscated, it will cost you Tens of thousands of $$,$$$ but you will NEVER be convicted for carrying concealed without a permit.