So only ONE back up gun then?

[Snoopy47]

I'm just going through the renewal paperwork and getting ready ahead of time.
***************

Page 10 of 17
Section 5 of DOJ Initial and Renewal Application
Revision JAN-2024
********
While exercising the privileges granted to the licensee under the terms of the license. The licensee shall not (pursuant to Penal Code section 26200), when carrying a concealed weapon as authorized by this license:

*Carry more than TWO firearms under the licensee’s control at one time

****************
Where I see this as a possible problem is a traffic stop while CCW, and making a trip to the range with 2+ firearms in addition to the CCW, or walking with a range bag with 2+ firearms in a parking lot going to a gun range.

I've not technically violated this because all my multiple firearm trips 100% involve starting in my home driveway, and ending on a private range. At no time was I carrying 3 or more firearms while on public property or property I didn't own or was a member of said private range.

If I was supposed to know this prior I must have missed it or forgotten it. I'm being silly with my logic, but it's clear one CANNOT carry three+ CCW firearms on them at one time.

I guess the logic is the licensee only has two hands and at no time can they control 3 or more while on their persons.

[9Cal_OC]

Thanks to SB2, that was included in that bill (and not included in the current litigation). If you’re transporting for trips to the range, you’d transport unloaded in locked containers with those on your permit (except two you plan on having loaded).

[BAJ475]

Thanks to SB2, that was included in that bill (and not included in the current litigation). If you’re transporting for trips to the range, you’d transport unloaded in locked containers with those on your permit (except two you plan on having loaded).

More CA BS. While I transport my guns to the range unloaded, unless they are on my person, they are not locked in any sort of container. Permit? Why should anyone need a permit to keep and bear arms, is it a Constitutional right?

[Sohum63]

I haven’t followed all the goings on recently and just found out when I did my renewal class. They must have had a big problem of ccw holders carrying 3 guns and had to put a stop to it.

[Snoopy47]

I haven’t followed all the goings on recently and just found out when I did my renewal class. They must have had a big problem of ccw holders carrying 3 guns and had to put a stop to it.

I'm curious, but I don't think that's what it is about. Maybe it happened once, but did the IA reach out to the legislatures and ask for the change? That would totally be in control of the IA policy anyway. It wouldn't need a state level LAW. That is UNLESS those in the legislature want to reign in IA's that might feel more generous with their policies.

I'd love to find media about CCW holders in CA. Are there any test cases going on justifying why we shouldn't have CCW's. Are there CCW holders saving folks left and right? Are there CCW holders flipping out and going postal?

What has happened to CA now that the flood gates have been opened for CCW applications.

The biggest change I have seen is my social media is FLOODED with holster advertisements.

[Sohum63]

I'm curious, but I don't think that's what it is about. Maybe it happened once, but did the IA reach out to the legislatures and ask for the change? That would totally be in control of the IA policy anyway. It wouldn't need a state level LAW. That is UNLESS those in the legislature want to reign in IA's that might feel more generous with their policies.

I'd love to find media about CCW holders in CA. Are there any test cases going on justifying why we shouldn't have CCW's. Are there CCW holders saving folks left and right? Are there CCW holders flipping out and going postal?

What has happened to CA now that the flood gates have been opened for CCW applications.

The biggest change I have seen is my social media is FLOODED with holster advertisements.

I doubt it was to address any specific issue, I assumed it was just the lawmakers doing whatever they could to exert some control. Personally, I’m surprise they didn’t limit it to one firearm, being California and all. Like you said the ia could put whatever limit they want on their license if it was a specific county that was having some issues.

[TTT]

Could be worse, New Mexico only allows one concealed.

[Dvrjon]

SB 2 was a gun control bill. The 2-gun limit on CCW was simply another way to control the number of guns available. There were no causative or correlative studies…it was just gun control.

As to the comment that this was the legislature/lawmakers’ normal course, let me assure you that nobody in the Capitol came up with this (or any other of the gun control activities of the past decade). This is anti-gun groups, often funded by Bloomberg, set out to socially re-engineer society. That’s how we got almost identical CCW legislative efforts initiated in CA and NY at the same time.

[Snoopy47]

SB 2 was a gun control bill. The 2-gun limit on CCW was simply another way to control the number of guns available. There were no causative or correlative studies…it was just gun control.

As to the comment that this was the legislature/lawmakers’ normal course, let me assure you that nobody in the Capitol came up with this (or any other of the gun control activities of the past decade). This is anti-gun groups, often funded by Bloomberg, set out to socially re-engineer society. That’s how we got almost identical CCW legislative efforts initiated in CA and NY at the same time.

Totally.............. recall............... 1,000 feet from schools was EXEMPT for CCW holders when that CCW was MAY ISSUE

Once it was SHALL ISSUE then CCW's lost the 1,000 foot exemption with everyone else.

No one was clamoring over closing little perks CCW's gave in a SHALL ISSUE environment. This is all panic to close the flood gates.