Sonoma

[baggss]

EXCELLENT work MC!

[GillaFunk]

The upside is, Freitas will be stepping down, and not running again.
Downside is his replacement will also want his subjects to be disarmed sheeple.

Buy property somewhere in a shall issue county and apply there.

[MudCamper]

SCSO PRAR Response

deleted

[GillaFunk]

Maintain residence in the green county if you "migrate"

[Lightstrider]

damn I might be migrating to Sonoma to work from a green county and was wondering if I can get a permit, guess not.

[GillaFunk]

waste of time.

[steven.westernretail@gmai]

Are you willing to sue over it? Did they give you an approval of some kind in writing before you did the finger prints?

If you get me your contact info (via a inbox message), I am happy to put you in touch with the attorneys that opposed the $500 fee increase for the psych eval, they may have an interest in your treatment.

I would love to, if we could get a group of 707'ers to go in on it.

[Naquai]

Are you willing to sue over it? Did they give you an approval of some kind in writing before you did the finger prints?

If you get me your contact info (via a inbox message), I am happy to put you in touch with the attorneys that opposed the $500 fee increase for the psych eval, they may have an interest in your treatment.

[Spyder]

I wish there was a recording of the meeting that several of us went to a couple years ago where Freitas told us that he would only issue a CCW to people he knew, and who had a lot of money. Paraphrased of course, but that was very clear when he explained a situation of one person who he had recently approved a CCW for, who was a friend or acquaintance of his who frequently carried cash on her person.

[Paladin]

So my initial approval has been rescinded, even after a clean Livescan.

<snip>

This is frustrating because I wouldn't have paid the ~$100 for a live scan if they hadn't approved me, and the live scan results had nothing to do with my denial.

I contacted the office, they said it was because they couldn't do a psych eval because of the Board of Directors decision. They said their policy has now reverted back to the old way.

I was offered a refund on the $40 application fee, but not on the livescan.

That sucks. Unless you plan on suing them over the ~$100 for the Live Scan, I'd grab the $40.

But what really sucks is Sonoma going back to/remaining restrictive issuance. I guess they think their law-abiding residents are "special snowflakes" -- er, make that just flakes -- who can't be trusted CCWing w/o psych evals.

Funny how CCWers are no problem in the 41 Shall Issue states and Vermont. (11 of those SI states have also passed ConCarry where Right to Keep Arms => Right to Bear Arms.)

Heck, CCWers from the 40+ CA counties that liberally issue CCWs are even no problem throughout CA!

[California Machine]

So my initial approval has been rescinded, even after a clean Livescan.

Basically my process was as follows:
1. Talked to Freitas at a town hall, he said they were changing their policy and encouraged me to apply.
2. Applied, paying the $40 initial fee.
3. Initial application approved, told to move to fingerprinting.
4. Pay ~$100 for livescan.
5. Livescan done and came back clean
6. Denial citing lack of good cause.


This is frustrating because I wouldn't have paid the ~$100 for a live scan if they hadn't approved me, and the live scan results had nothing to do with my denial.

I contacted the office, they said it was because they couldn't do a psych eval because of the Board of Directors decision. They said their policy has now reverted back to the old way.

I was offered a refund on the $40 application fee, but not on the livescan.

[GillaFunk]

Help please, what's a PRAR?

Public Records Request (Act)

[estrom]

Help please, what's a PRAR?

[MudCamper]

deleted

[estrom]

Some were issued from Feb 14-27, 2014. After that...not so much.