I agree with you about en banc, however SD has proven themselves to be idiots many times in the past.
Please do post what they say about if they plan to change their policies though. I'm going to ask them the same thing tomorrow.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Mateo
Collapse
X
-
F that, I'm going to return the sheriff's favor and send in a new app tomorrow or Monday.
"I wish to acquire a permit to carry a firearm for the lawful purpose of self defense." (Round 2)
I don't think there is going to be an en banc hearing, and I think only an idiot would appeal to the supreme court, they are going to affirm!Last edited by thedrickel; 02-13-2014, 9:55 PM.Leave a comment:
-
When should I start preparing my paperwork with the news from the 9th Circuit?
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=893372
-GeneLeave a comment:
-
I've been asked this so many times today, that if I had a nickel for each...I'd need a dump truck.
I say "Not yet, perhaps not any time soon."
There could be a petition for rehearing en banc. That would be 11 on the panel, vs. 3 from the decision just handed down. That means more paperwork, more arguments, and more waiting.
I don't do Federal appellate practice, but my reading of FRAP Rule 4, Rule 35 and the Circuit rules leads me to think a petition for rehearing could pop up in the next 14 days (a deadline which can apparently be extended by the court) If I'm mistaken in my read of Rule 4, then it could be as far out as 60 days, or more, before we know if there will be any further action.
I say let this development sink in and see who makes the next move (if any).
When should I start preparing my paperwork with the news from the 9th Circuit?
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=893372Leave a comment:
-
When should I start preparing my paperwork with the news from the 9th Circuit?
Leave a comment:
-
Just posted this in the Merced thread, but it applies here too since SM is now requiring folks in cities to turn in their CCW apps to the CoP, not the sheriff.
We just won the Lu case against LASO. No more "you have to apply first and get denied before applying w/the SO" illegal requirements anymore!
If there is no appeal by LA, [San Mateo] will have to fall in line pretty fast. Even if there is an appeal, not sure a court will stay the trial court's ruling pending the appeal. IOW, things will improve in [San Mateo], just not sure if immediately.Leave a comment:
-
Just posted this in the Merced thread, but it applies here too since SM is now requiring folks in cities to turn in their CCW apps to the CoP, not the sheriff.
We just won the Lu case against LASO. No more "you have to apply first and get denied before applying w/the SO" illegal requirements anymore!
If there is no appeal by LA, [San Mateo] will have to fall in line pretty fast. Even if there is an appeal, not sure a court will stay the trial court's ruling pending the appeal. IOW, things will improve in [San Mateo], just not sure if immediately.Last edited by Paladin; 01-14-2014, 5:05 PM.Leave a comment:
-
OK, like is said renewal may be fine now but we will see in two years unless someone stops this.
There is only 160 ltc's in the county so its probably not on their priority list at this point which is good for now.Last edited by taperxz; 01-10-2014, 9:46 PM.Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
-
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,854,664
Posts: 24,998,135
Members: 353,086
Active Members: 6,065
Welcome to our newest member, kylejimenez932.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 18161 users online. 112 members and 18049 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Leave a comment: