Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

44Mag, Copes Settle Litigation Filed by San Francisco Over Rebuild Kits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CMonfort
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 464

    44Mag, Copes Settle Litigation Filed by San Francisco Over Rebuild Kits

    Copes Distributing, Inc and 44Mag Distributing, LLC, have authorized the release of the following statement on their behalf concerning this litigation:



    December 18, 2013


    Copes Distributing, Inc. (“Copes”) and 44Mag Distributing, LLC (“44Mag”) have entered into a settlement agreement with the San Francisco District Attorney’s office that effectively terminates the litigation for these parties.

    The companies admitted no wrongdoing under the settlement agreement, and Copes and 44Mag steadfastly maintain that they have at all times operated in compliance with all state and local laws. Neither company will be required to disclose customer information to the City under the agreement, nor was any customer information disclosed during the course of the litigation.

    The companies stipulated to settle the case for $15,000 and an agreement to discontinue sales of the body of any magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds to California customers. The companies also agreed to send a letter to San Francisco and Sunnyvale customers advising them of those cities’ recently enacted magazines possession bans.

    Although the companies believed they would prevail on the merits of the case, each company opted to settle the matter to protect against the possibility that customer identities might be revealed during the litigation. Also, given the passage of the vaguely worded Assembly Bill 48 (AB 48) earlier this year, the companies did not intend to continue selling these parts for standard-capacity magazines after the first of the year. Rather than spend money fighting over the legality of rebuild kits after the passage of AB 48, Copes and 44Mag instead intend to make financial contributions to the NRA’s California lawsuits seeking to confirm Second Amendment protections for standard-capacity magazines.

    Should the sale of standard-capacity magazines or repair kits be deemed legal by any court order, stipulation, or change in legislation, the settlement agreement provides that these companies may resume sales to California customers.

    Copes and 44Mag would like to thank their customer for their patience and support during the litigation, and they look forward to continuing to serve their California customers.
    Last edited by CMonfort; 12-18-2013, 12:00 PM.
    sigpic
    CMonfort@michellawyers.com
    www.michellawyers.com
    www.calgunlaws.com
    Subscribe to Receive News Bulletins

  • #2
    AKSOG
    Veteran Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 4139

    Not a horrible resolution. Bummer they had to pay anything though.

    Comment

    • #3
      vintagearms
      Calguns Addict
      • Jan 2009
      • 6841

      "The companies stipulated to settle the case for $15,000 and an agreement to discontinue sales of the body of any magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds to California customers."

      So, it looks like AB 48 effectively banned mag bodies not springs, plates or followers. Its a sad day.

      Comment

      • #4
        newglockster
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 1592

        Originally posted by AKSOG
        Not a horrible resolution. Bummer they had to pay anything though.
        This
        John 3:16

        Comment

        • #5
          vtabiker
          Member
          • Oct 2012
          • 396

          Originally posted by vintagearms
          "The companies stipulated to settle the case for $15,000 and an agreement to discontinue sales of the body of any magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds to California customers."

          So, it looks like AB 48 effectively banned mag bodies not springs, plates or followers. Its a sad day.
          I'm going to guess they figured $15,000 was cheaper than paying for lawyers to work on something that's going to be a mute point in a couple weeks.

          Comment

          • #6
            IPSICK
            Veteran Member
            • Nov 2005
            • 4259

            Well I guess the focus with magazines will be centered directly on the large-capacity restrictions which was expected.
            "When you get the (men) to the range, you just get the men. But when you bring the (women) to the range, you get the (whole family). And that's what's going to save our 2nd Amendment."--Dianna Liedorff

            "Since self-preservation is the 1st law of nature, we assert the...right to self-defense. The Constitution...clearly affirms the right of every American...to bear arms. And as Americans, we will not give up a single right guaranteed under the Constitution." --Malcolm X

            Comment

            • #7
              flyingcaveman
              Junior Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 78

              I hope these companies will sent out letters to all their customers to preserve the anonymity of those ones who live in San Fransisco or Sunnyvale. The mail isn't secure. They could use the postal service to help compile a list of people who might have bought a rebuild kit. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/us...nail-mail.html

              Comment

              • #8
                SantaCabinetguy
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Feb 2011
                • 15137

                Originally posted by vintagearms
                "The companies stipulated to settle the case for $15,000 and an agreement to discontinue sales of the body of any magazine capable of holding more than ten rounds to California customers."

                So, it looks like AB 48 effectively banned mag bodies not springs, plates or followers. Its a sad day.
                Hauoli Makahiki Hou


                -------

                Comment

                • #9
                  leman77
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 1168

                  Hopefully they will pay them with bags of pennies totalling 15,000.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Grnjeep1
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 651

                    Interesting to see what happens with Exile now, especially since that case is going forward, and customer info has been requested by the city. Seems like SF didn't want to big a fight with Michel&associates, and is focusing on the party who is being defended by the guy who couldn't pay his California bar dues.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      epilepticninja
                      Veteran Member
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 4166

                      Nothing like getting strong armed into paying $15,000 over nothing. I love how gov't entities can just up and sue anyone for anything, and the dickheads behind the lawsuits could care less because it's not their money. Too bad the public doesn't have more of a say so in this kind of taxpayer waste.
                      Former political prisoner who escaped on 9-24-23.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Full Clip
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 10263

                        I'm sure both companies have spent far more in legal fees just getting to this settlement amount. Ugly, unjust and unconstitutional malicious prosecution...
                        BTW, I have been a customer of 44Mag for years and they have always done right by me. I'm sorry they got caught up in this foolishness.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          RRangel
                          CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                          • Oct 2005
                          • 5164

                          Another example of why those running the city of San Francisco are worthless. Just think how many actual criminals, could have been dealt with, instead of them wasting time, money, and effort attacking the Second Amendment.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            kcjr1125
                            Veteran Member
                            • Apr 2012
                            • 3883

                            This is infuriating. They should be receiving payment not dishing it out.
                            Originally posted by OHOD
                            I guess I could rub my muff against his exwifes muff. Is that what they call muff diving?
                            Originally posted by ivanimal
                            I love you! (some Homo)
                            I am a Gay muslim sometimes.
                            we never had the problems in CA till the whiteys took over. We used to hunt, fish, roam, then they showed up and wanted to be civilized.............Ruined it for everyone!

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Hiking CA
                              Member
                              • Mar 2011
                              • 467

                              My intuition is telling there is more to the story...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1