Processing PPT from Exempt to Non-Exempt

[CSACANNONEER]

Couldn't help yourself could you (8319)

I can only find one person who is trying to up his post count without adding anything to this thread and, it's not kemasa or taperxz.

[Tyke8319]

Where's Rodney King when we need him??

[Kestryll]

Oh this one's going to be FUN to go through...

[kemasa]

Couldn't help yourself could you (8319)

You really need to look in the mirror. It is amazing that you are SO focused on my post count, as if it means something and I already told you I have been on this forum years longer than you. I don't pay attention to it, but it really seems to matter to you for some odd reason.

Add to that, you still can't stick to the topic and instead you want to attack me. Have I hurt you little feelings? Perhaps you need to go to a safe room until you feel better. Or is it that you are posting just to increase your post count in order to feel better about yourself? In either case it is really pathetic of you.

[rbetts]

Couldn't help yourself could you (8319)

[kemasa]

LOL. Ok, OK, your unit can be bigger than mine if that's what you want. But for what it's worth, barfing all over threads or titty-tats because someone disagrees with you serves the thread no good and is a complete waste of time when someone is actually seeking information that is helpful. Good luck in that consulting career, you and the crickets can sing all you want. . . . . . . (oh look, my post count is rising now too)

What exactly do you think that you are doing? It is not even on topic.

I might also point out that you bring up numbers, I point out that it is bogus and why, so then you have to respond with a stupid statement. As to the consulting, too bad you can't figure out how to block people, but based on your comments that is not unexpected, and it seems that when you can't figure things out, you are not bright enough to get assistance.

How about you trying to sticking to the topic instead of trying to bash people?

[rbetts]

LOL. Ok, OK, your unit can be bigger than mine if that's what you want. But for what it's worth, barfing all over threads or titty-tats because someone disagrees with you serves the thread no good and is a complete waste of time when someone is actually seeking information that is helpful. Good luck in that consulting career, you and the crickets can sing all you want. . . . . . . (oh look, my post count is rising now too)

[kemasa]

8314 and counting. (It feels good pad my count a little) thanks for leading the way Kemasa. Please point me to the "ignore a user" button on Calguns. Many a thread could use a delousing.

The number really does not matter, as well I have been a member longer than you have, but you seem to just want to continue to make snide remarks.

Your PPD is 0.34, whereas mine is 1.85. I suspect that I help people more than you do, which perhaps makes you jealous as you might not be able to answer questions or perhaps you just choose not to.

If you can't find it, you can hire me as a consultant to assist you. I charge more for people who are clueless though, just a warning.

[rbetts]

8314 and counting. (It feels good pad my count a little) thanks for leading the way Kemasa. Please point me to the "ignore a user" button on Calguns. Many a thread could use a delousing.

[Cokebottle]

So those that can are :

CHP
City Police Departments
County Sheriff Departments
Department of Correction Officers
Federal Sworn Peace Officers (FBI, Marshall, Flight Officer)

Those who could in 2016 can still do so.

[kemasa]

No wonder your post counts are so high. . . .Both of you. . . . Sheesh!! Why not use PM's for your panty clumping. It would be the polite thing to do for the rest of us. . . .

Nope, not the reason, but thank you for your interest. Feel free to ignore anything that you like. It is nice to know that you speak for everyone else. I guess I missed that election, but perhaps it was just in your mind and I prefer to stick with reality.

[Chewy65]

Ok.
LEO has an off roster handgun (that they bought USING THEIR EXEMPTION) and they PPT it to NON LEO.

LEO has an off roster handgun (that they bought WITHOUT USING THEIR EXEMPTION) and they PPT it to NON LEO.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE ???

The state simply determined that it does not want the LEO exemption to be used to circumvent the roster.

[rbetts]

No wonder your post counts are so high. . . .Both of you. . . . Sheesh!! Why not use PM's for your panty clumping. It would be the polite thing to do for the rest of us. . . .

[PolishMike]

Wow, do you really believe that? Do you really not see what you have posted? I am not the one being childish with the snide comments. You really need to take a long, hard look in the mirror. Talk about a person stomping their feet and declaring that they are right, that seems to apply to you.



Without any proof or basis you claim that the CA DOJ can't or won't go after a FFL, Amazing. It must be so nice to be able to see the future and know so much.







You last line conflicts with the first.



Even if there is a database of LEOs, which is likely, they have to have access to use that in terms of the DROS, but more than that they also have to know the employer and the position. You want to claim all of that exists, but then you say perhaps but perhaps not, so you don't even know what you are saying is true, but you keep pushing it.



You say it is so, so prove it. I don't know if it exists or not, I don't know if it exists that they can even use it with respect to the DROS.

[kemasa]

Ok.
LEO has an off roster handgun (that they bought USING THEIR EXEMPTION) and they PPT it to NON LEO.

LEO has an off roster handgun (that they bought WITHOUT USING THEIR EXEMPTION) and they PPT it to NON LEO.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE ???

First off, the law does not apply to all LEOs, only some. It seems that CA does not think everyone is the same, not even LEOs. Some are better and more entitled than others, the politicians being the most entitled, at least in their own minds.

If the LEO mentioned about is one of the newly added category with the limitation, then in the first case it is illegal to transfer and the second case it is not. That is the only difference. It is the government, it does not have to make sense. The wonderful politicians don't like people figuring out ways around their stupid and unconstitutional laws, so they keep trying to make changes to prevent it.