Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I'm receiving e-mail to vote for Kashkari ?
Collapse
X
-
I picked cash-carry as a protest vote, everyone knew he couldn't win so it was safe. Last thing we need is Brown running around like he thinks he has a mandate from the people. 40% against says to him, "not everyone is with me".
That will help.Comment
-
Originally posted by CAguyThe majority of that 40% (my self included) are worried about schools and our children's educations. I'd say the vast majority who voted for Kashkari also voted for Tuck Marshall for superintendent of public instruction. Even a good deal of Brown supporters did as well even though doing so is a bit of a oxymoron since we all know Brown/Torlakson are both in the unions pocket.
Some people vote for other reasons besides magazine capacities/guns. All the votes for Brown/Torlaskson were a vote against our children's educations.Comment
-
Originally posted by CAguyThe majority of that 40% (my self included) are worried about schools and our children's educations. I'd say the vast majority who voted for Kashkari also voted for Tuck Marshall for superintendent of public instruction. Even a good deal of Brown supporters did as well even though doing so is a bit of a oxymoron since we all know Brown/Torlakson are both in the unions pocket.
Some people vote for other reasons besides magazine capacities/guns. All the votes for Brown/Torlaskson were a vote against our children's educations.
Kaskari would have done the same. Would that have helped schools? Did Kaskari giving away trillions on the national level to banks help schools?
Browns not great but these banker supported RINOs certainly are not conservative with tax payer money. Voting for them is not conservative. Giving billions/trillions to scams is not gonna help schools.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, breaking with fellow Republicans to flex his own political muscle, persuaded his California constituents to spend $3 billion on stem-cell research
Arnold Schwarzenegger’s “solutions to California’s energy woes” reflect those of former Enron chief Ken Lay. On May 17, 2001, in the midst of California’sThe energy trader agrees to pay $1.52 billion for its role in the 2000-01 power crisis, but California is likely to get only one-sixth of that.
Enron Settles State Claim of Price Gouging
The energy trader agrees to pay $1.52 billion for its role in the 2000-01 power crisis, but California is likely to get only one-sixth of that.
Still, state officials said they were pleased to nail down the settlement, which includes a hefty penalty and exceeds the $60 million they once demanded from Enron as part of a quest for $9 billion in alleged overcharges from power suppliers during the energy crisis.Last edited by bonusweb; 11-07-2014, 1:14 PM.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,856,773
Posts: 25,024,052
Members: 354,026
Active Members: 5,933
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3876 users online. 176 members and 3700 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment