Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

$10,000 fine for no insurance

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    spike90049
    Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 154

    Laughably absurd. This doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell.

    Comment

    • #17
      Jazeronthelaser
      Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 251

      Originally posted by Nick Adams
      Yes we do need insurance for the other nine. It's called the second.
      That was awesome.
      NRA Member
      http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php

      Comment

      • #18
        R19
        Veteran Member
        • Nov 2012
        • 2697

        Originally posted by dunndeal
        Perhaps Congress should pass a law requiring "Libelous Speech Insurance" in case someone might say something wrong.
        This exists. Personal and commercial liability insurance.

        Insurance companies would write liability insurance policies for firearm owners. They would be highly profitable writing them. Also, if it were required, then it's a slam dunk for the insurers - a guaranteed market.
        Last edited by R19; 04-02-2013, 11:27 AM.
        You want to sit on the sideline and watch or do you want to play ball? - Tom Buchanan
        Life is something you dominate if you're any good at it. - Tom Buchanan
        The hardest part of the business is minding your own. - French Montana


        Comment

        • #19
          Wiz-of-Awd
          Veteran Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 3556

          Originally posted by CHIEFone
          there is NO insurance company that would write a firearms specific policy! well maybe Lloyd's of London
          Sure there are - all of them.
          If enacted and made "law," they too will be forced to do the bidding of the King.

          Besides, there is money to be made, so they will comply.

          A.W.D.
          Seven. The answer is always seven.

          Comment

          • #20
            Wherryj
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Mar 2010
            • 11085

            Aside from the fact that no insurance will write a policy for willful acts (as most of the proposed bills seem to insist), there is another issue with requiring insurance.

            Many people say that the entire field of medical malpractice has evolved because there is so much insurance money to make it a profitable field. If gun owners are all wandering around with millions of dollars in "easy money", there will be zero chance that any issue surrounding a firearm doesn't end up in court.

            As it is now too many families of criminals will sue the victim of the crime for protecting himself/herself, but many lawyers won't take the case if there's nothing to collect. Imagine if EVERY case had a huge pot of gold at the end of the shakedown...'er I mean rainbow.
            Last edited by Wherryj; 04-02-2013, 11:40 AM.
            "What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?"
            -Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice
            "Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
            I like my guns like the left likes their voters-"undocumented".

            Comment

            • #21
              Wherryj
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Mar 2010
              • 11085

              Originally posted by R19
              This exists. Personal and commercial liability insurance.

              Insurance companies would write liability insurance policies for firearm owners. They would be highly profitable writing them. Also, if it were required, then it's a slam dunk for the insurers - a guaranteed market.
              ..except that pretty much EVERY one of the proposed laws has willful acts listed as requiring insurance.

              How much do you think a home owners' policy that covers the home owner's arson would cost? Auto insurance that also pays if you intentionally drive into a bus stop? Such policies don't exist.
              "What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?"
              -Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice
              "Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
              I like my guns like the left likes their voters-"undocumented".

              Comment

              • #22
                POLICESTATE
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Apr 2009
                • 18185

                How about a $10,000 fine for anyone who fails to get

                Free Speech insurance
                Free Religion insurance
                Free Press insurance

                And so on and so forth.
                -POLICESTATE,
                In the name of the State, and of the School, and of the Infallible Science


                sigpic


                Government Official Lies
                . F r e e d o m . D i e s .

                Comment

                • #23
                  RonnieP
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 2750

                  Originally posted by mtnhrdgr2
                  Wow, insurance requirement for 1 of the enumerated Bill of Rights? Does this mean we need insurance for the other 9?
                  Yes.
                  Trump 2016

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    RonnieP
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 2750

                    Originally posted by POLICESTATE
                    How about a $10,000 fine for anyone who fails to get

                    Free Speech insurance
                    Free Religion insurance
                    Free Press insurance

                    And so on and so forth.
                    Theres no need for all those insurance since free speech, religion, press, property will all be taken away once the government no longer fears the people.
                    Trump 2016

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      Virginian
                      Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 126

                      How about voters insurance, so when the voters do something incredibly stupid (again) we get a check.

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        SilverTauron
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 5699

                        Its just another way to ban guns via the end run process.

                        Like (illegally)driving around rush hour traffic in the breakdown lane, the antis are using the insurance business as a fulcrum to get theirs at our expense-literally.

                        Eventually Homo Hoplophobicus will get around to requiring each gun you own have a separate entry on a listed insurance policy, much like vehicles are today. Naturally doing so won't be free, and various risk factors like having kids in the home, localized crime rates, and the age of the owner and his/her criminal and credit score will be used to compute an expensive premium.

                        The effect? People will sell and surrender their guns if the insurance "tax" is too much to bear. Our pastime is not the cheapest as it is, to say nothing of what happens when the insurance adjuster sends you a $250 monthly bill to insure 2 pistols. Add another one, and now you must consider how much higher your rate will be.

                        To illustrate the endgame, look at car insurance. I bought the car I have now because the one I truly wanted was simply too expensive to insure-and I couldn't legally own it without car insurance, so that was that. This is what the antis want: a generation of people disarmed because they cant afford to exercise their rights.
                        The more prohibitions you have, the less virtuous people will be.
                        The more subsidies you have, the less self reliant people will be.
                        -Lao-Tzu, Tau Te Ching. 479 BCE

                        The 1911 may have been in wars for 100 years, but Masetro Bartolomeo Beretta was arming the world 400 years before John Browning was ever a wet dream.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          Jet Setter
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Aug 2012
                          • 5348

                          Freaking ridiculous.
                          *********************
                          WTS:
                          1. PW 800+ Hydro Multispeed (just the hydraulic unit that also works with Spolar press)
                          2. PW 800B converted to 800C (12 gauge) with lots of accessories and upgrades
                          3. Hornady 366 (12 gauge)

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            vonderplatz
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 1249

                            Not going to happen unless we lose the House.
                            There's no such thing as a former Marine. - General James F. Amos, 35th Commandant of the Marine Corps

                            Romans 1:16 - 32

                            sigpic

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              kimber_ss
                              Senior Member
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 2171

                              Maloney is full of baloney. I looked up a picture of her and it cracked my screen. Don't try it, she really does need some serious cosmetic work done.

                              Maybe a head transplant. Just don't put back the "abbey normal" brain.
                              Last edited by kimber_ss; 04-02-2013, 10:17 PM.
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                Fyathyrio
                                Senior Member
                                • Nov 2009
                                • 1082

                                $10k penalty for owning a gun without this proposed insurance, but 0bamacare will only charge you $695 per person to $2,085 per family in 2016, when fully phased in, if you fail to get medical insurance. Makes perfect sense to me...
                                "Everything I ever learned about leadership, I learned from a Chief Petty Officer." - John McCain
                                "Use your hammer, not your mouth, jackass!" - Mike Ditka
                                There has never been a shortage of people eager to draw up blueprints for running other people's lives. - Thomas Sowell
                                Originally posted by James Earl Jones
                                The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will lose.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1