I'm sure how you can say that with a straight face, but regardless, they've got a 1A right to push a political agenda as they see fit. You don't have to watch their news or buy their papers.
You say collusion/corruption, I just see cooperation. It's even in the public's interest to report information from the PD's. You want them to hire PI's to investigate every little stabbing before they report on it? Corruption would be the news companies agreeing to not report on stories that put PD's in a negative light. At least in San Diego that seems to not be the case (they reported heavily on the cop sexual coercion case, for example).
Just because someone is anti-gun doesn't make them evil and corrupt.
You say collusion/corruption, I just see cooperation. It's even in the public's interest to report information from the PD's. You want them to hire PI's to investigate every little stabbing before they report on it? Corruption would be the news companies agreeing to not report on stories that put PD's in a negative light. At least in San Diego that seems to not be the case (they reported heavily on the cop sexual coercion case, for example).
Just because someone is anti-gun doesn't make them evil and corrupt.


Comment