I have a friend who just moved here from Hawaii on orders and was ignorant of the state requirement to go through an FFL to when buying firearms from a private party.
I have no clue if the seller knew or not. A few things we know are his phone number and that he is indeed a CA resident based on the bill of sale that they both signed.
What needs to happen to make this right? He is in the military and any type of hot water could possibly revoke the clearance that he holds.
I know of the voluntary registration but doesn't that apply to handguns only?
Do both parties need to be involved
Thanks in advance for the guidance.
I have no clue if the seller knew or not. A few things we know are his phone number and that he is indeed a CA resident based on the bill of sale that they both signed.
What needs to happen to make this right? He is in the military and any type of hot water could possibly revoke the clearance that he holds.
I know of the voluntary registration but doesn't that apply to handguns only?
Do both parties need to be involved
Thanks in advance for the guidance.

Why not just keep the shotgun out of public domaine and just do the PPT when the other guy is back from deployment? No harm no foul in just storing this for the guy while he is out of town, new bill of sale and you are good to go ?!!!! I do not think this would be a Federal case unless you want to make it one. To comply with the law when he is back is better than not at all. Just my 2 cents worth
Comment